1995
DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1995.1093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

α-Particle Radiotherapy with 211At-Labeled Monodisperse Polymer Particles, 211At-Labeled IgG Proteins, and Free 211At in a Murine Intraperitoneal Tumor Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In studies performed with 211 At bound to polystyrene microparticles, higher cure rates in mice with IP tumors were obtained than after treatment with β-emitting 32 P-colloid [12] . Interestingly, when the antitumor effect of the 211 At-microparticles was compared with unspecific 211 At-labeled antibody, similar survival but no clear dose-response relationship was observed [10] . This can indicate that the benefit of longer residence time in the peritoneal cavity with microparticles as carriers was not fully exploited with a short-lived nuclide like 211 At or that the distribution of the microparticles in the peritoneal cavity was not optimal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In studies performed with 211 At bound to polystyrene microparticles, higher cure rates in mice with IP tumors were obtained than after treatment with β-emitting 32 P-colloid [12] . Interestingly, when the antitumor effect of the 211 At-microparticles was compared with unspecific 211 At-labeled antibody, similar survival but no clear dose-response relationship was observed [10] . This can indicate that the benefit of longer residence time in the peritoneal cavity with microparticles as carriers was not fully exploited with a short-lived nuclide like 211 At or that the distribution of the microparticles in the peritoneal cavity was not optimal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IP therapy with α-emitters has previously been examined in murine models with two carrier types: nano- to microsized particles [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] and monoclonal antibodies [13] , [14] , [15] , [16] , [17] , [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] . With particles as carriers for radionuclides, it is possible to choose a size that facilitates a high retention of the particles in the peritoneal cavity [22] , [23] and thus contribute to the therapeutic radiation being delivered in the target location.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…administration to mice inoculated with the K13 hybridoma cell line. 101 Biodistribution studies indicated that free 211 At -spread rapidly in the whole body, whereas the microsphere and the antibodies were mostly retained in the peritoneal cavity, highlighting a good stability. However, the authors concluded that the efficiency of the astatinated antibodies was superior to the microspheres due to a better diffusion in the peritoneal area.…”
Section: Astatination and Stability Of Biomolecules Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In a preliminary study performed in a murine ascites tumor model, significant prolongation in median survival was observed even at 211 At-labeled monodisperse polymer particles doses as low as 7 kBq (0.19 µCi) [40]. Although only a 20% cure rate was observed, it is difficult to ascertain the potential utility of this reagent because the maximum activity level investigated was only 500 kBq (13.5 µCi), considerably below the expected maximum tolerated dose of this labeled particulate.…”
Section: Astatine-211-labeled Particu-lates For Intracavity Applica-tmentioning
confidence: 98%