2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0012-365x(99)00131-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

α-Domination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the probabilistic construction used to obtain the bounds (9) and (11) is different from that to obtain the bounds (4) and (7).…”
Section: Corollary 1 Generalises the Following Well-known Upper Boundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the probabilistic construction used to obtain the bounds (9) and (11) is different from that to obtain the bounds (4) and (7).…”
Section: Corollary 1 Generalises the Following Well-known Upper Boundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our first lemma ensures that i (G) is well defined for every graph G. This statement actually follows easily from a colouring result of Cowen and Emerson (stated as Theorem 8 in [3]). Nevertheless, in order to make our presentation self-contained we include a short proof using a classical Erdős-type exchange argument.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In the present paper we initiate the study of a similarly defined class of 'perfect' graphs using the concept of -domination that has recently been introduced by Dunbar et al [3]. Our main result is the characterization of -domination perfect trees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In graph theory such a set is called a dominating set and the problem of finding a dominating set of minimal cardinality is NP-complete [3]. The notion was generalised introducing k-domination where each node needs to have at least k neighbours in the dominating set, and α domination where 0 < α ≤ 1, where each node not in the dominating set needs to have at least α * 100 percent of its neighbours in the dominating set [4], and α-rate domination [5] where each node (including ones in the dominating set) needs to have at least α * 100 percent of its neighbours in the dominating set. Again, finding minimum cardinalities of α and α-rate dominating sets is NP-complete.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%