1981
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1981.tb01613.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

α‐Bungarotoxin Binding in House Fly Heads and Torpedo Electroplax

Abstract: House fly heads contain a site that binds alpha-bungarotoxin with high affinity. It is present at about 23 pmol/g of heads and binds alpha-bungarotoxin (labeled with [3H]pyridoxamine phosphate) reversibly with a Kd of 6 nM. The effects of 48 drugs have been compared on the alpha-bungarotoxin binding sites of house fly and Torpedo. The pharmacology of the house fly sites is similar to that previously reported for neuronal alpha-bungarotoxin binding sites in both vertebrates and invertebrates and is distinguisha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The main difference between the pharmacology of house fly QNB binding and that of the established vertebrate muscarinic receptor is the lower effectiveness of drugs not classically considered muscarinic on the house fly site. This is in contrast with the result with a-BGT binding to house fly (and rat) brain where there are clear differences between the sensitivity of classic nicotinic receptors and the sensitivity of those sites to several nicotinic drugs (Morley et al, 1979;Jones et al, 1981).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main difference between the pharmacology of house fly QNB binding and that of the established vertebrate muscarinic receptor is the lower effectiveness of drugs not classically considered muscarinic on the house fly site. This is in contrast with the result with a-BGT binding to house fly (and rat) brain where there are clear differences between the sensitivity of classic nicotinic receptors and the sensitivity of those sites to several nicotinic drugs (Morley et al, 1979;Jones et al, 1981).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…a-Bungarotoxin (a-BGT) at M was completely ineffective. This clearly distinguishes the house fly head QNB binding site from the a-BGT binding site that is present in the same preparation (Jones et al, 1981). The ineffectiveness of these drugs and others such as choline, ouabain, and DFP are signs of the specificity of these sites.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Translating our neurotoxin binding results to other target species, there are several studies showing that nAChRs are sensitive to α-Btx in other insects, including the cockroach Periplaneta americana , the moth Manduca sexta and the housefly Musca domestica ( Salgado and Saar, 2004 ; Eastham et al, 1998 ; Jones et al, 1981 ). The exact α-Btx binding mechanism in these organisms is unknown or under investigation ( Salgado, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A specific, saturable 125 1-a-bungarotoxin binding component, with the pharmacological properties of an acetylcholine receptor has been described in membrane extracts of the following insect preparations: fly heads of Drosophila melanogaster (Schmidt-Nielsen et al 1977;Hall, 1980;Dudai & Amsterdam, 1977;Dudai, 1977Dudai, , 1978Dudai, , 1980Rudloff, Jimenez & Bartels, 1980) andMusca domestica (Dudai, 1977;Harris et al 1979;Cattell, Harris & Donnellan, 1980;Jones, Sudershan & O'Brien, 1981), brain tissue of the moth Manduca sexta (Sanes, Prescott & Hildebrand, 1977;Hildebrand, 1980), cerebral ganglia of the locust Locusta migratoria (Breer, 1981) and in abdominal nerve cords of the cockroach Periplaneta americana (Gepner, Hall & Sattelle, 1978). These preparations have a high concentration of a-bungarotoxin binding sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%