1998
DOI: 10.1006/jcat.1997.1931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

α-Alumina-Supported Nickel Catalysts Prepared from Nickel Acetylacetonate: A TPR Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
57
0
6

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
9
57
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The Ni-La-1 and Ni/h-Al 2 O 3 catalysts showed similar TPR patterns, i.e., a broad peak at peak maximum of about 923 K and a small shoulder peak at peak maximum of about 1,073 K. Furthermore, the lower reduction peak of the Ni/h-Al 2 O 3 catalyst was sharper than that of the Ni-La-1 catalyst, which can be explained as the effect of La 2 O 3 in the catalysts. The broad peak could be attributed to the reduction of complex NiO species having strong interactions with the support while the small shoulder peak was assigned to the reduction of the highly dispersed NiAl 2 O 4 species as discussed in other investigations [31,[38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Characterization Of Ni/mo X /Al 2 Omentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Ni-La-1 and Ni/h-Al 2 O 3 catalysts showed similar TPR patterns, i.e., a broad peak at peak maximum of about 923 K and a small shoulder peak at peak maximum of about 1,073 K. Furthermore, the lower reduction peak of the Ni/h-Al 2 O 3 catalyst was sharper than that of the Ni-La-1 catalyst, which can be explained as the effect of La 2 O 3 in the catalysts. The broad peak could be attributed to the reduction of complex NiO species having strong interactions with the support while the small shoulder peak was assigned to the reduction of the highly dispersed NiAl 2 O 4 species as discussed in other investigations [31,[38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Characterization Of Ni/mo X /Al 2 Omentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Moreover, the broad peak, appearing in the catalysts of Ni-La-1 and Ni/h-Al 2 O 3 , changed to a small shoulder peak in Ni-La-2 and Ni-La-3 catalysts. It is reported [38] that the hydrogen consumption peaks, appearing at different temperature regions, are assigned to the reduction of different species. Generally, low temperature peak can be attributed to the reduction of larger NiO particles, which are relatively free and can be detected by XRD analysis, while the higher temperature peak is assigned to the reduction of complex NiO species having intimate contact with the support [39].…”
Section: Characterization Of Ni/mo X /Al 2 Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ni/Mg/ AlO showed two reduction peaks with T M at 620 and 1017 K, respectively. The former peak at 620 K corresponded to the reduction of the nickel not included in the co-precipitation which was deposited over mixed oxides or the nickel which had low interaction with the support [39], and the latter at 1017 K was ascribed to the reduction of nickel in the NiOMgO solid solution. Ni/Mg/AlO-F only displayed one reduction peak with T M at around 980 K, indicating all NiO species were highly distributed in the bulk phase of the periclase-type NiO-MgO solid solution [30].…”
Section: Basicitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As Ni II is reduced to Ni 0 without going through intermediate oxides, the hydrogen consumption peaks appearing in different temperature regions have been assigned to the reduction of different species. [45] Generally, low-temperature peaks are attributed to the reduction of large NiO particles, while the peaks at higher temperature are attributed to the reduction of NiO in intimate contact with the oxide support.…”
Section: Redox Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 98%