2005
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.076919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

α‐1 adrenergic input to solitary nucleus neurones: calcium oscillations, excitation and gastric reflex control

Abstract: The nucleus of the solitary tract (NST) processes substantial visceral afferent input and sends divergent projections to a wide array of CNS targets. The NST is essential to the maintenance of behavioural and autonomic homeostasis and is the source, as well as the recipient, of considerable noradrenergic (NE) projections. The significance of NE projections from the NST to other CNS regions has long been appreciated, but the nature of NE action on NST neurones themselves, especially on the α-1 receptor subtype,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relative changes in intracellular calcium in response to electrical stimulation were quantified as changes in fluorescence (%) as follows: ⌬F/F, where F is the fluorescence intensity within an area of interest (e.g., the outline of an RF neuron) averaged over the 3 s before stimulation and ⌬F is the maximum change from this value during a 0.5-s window following electrical stimulation (41). This normalization of the amount (%) of change in activity/fluorescence of any given region of interest could then be compared by a paired t-test for drug effects on the response to electrical stimulation (P Ͻ 0.05 criteria).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative changes in intracellular calcium in response to electrical stimulation were quantified as changes in fluorescence (%) as follows: ⌬F/F, where F is the fluorescence intensity within an area of interest (e.g., the outline of an RF neuron) averaged over the 3 s before stimulation and ⌬F is the maximum change from this value during a 0.5-s window following electrical stimulation (41). This normalization of the amount (%) of change in activity/fluorescence of any given region of interest could then be compared by a paired t-test for drug effects on the response to electrical stimulation (P Ͻ 0.05 criteria).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The response to 10 nM carbachol also differed in that after the initial peak Ca 2ϩ i decreased and increased in an oscillatory manner. On the basis of our recent work, we attribute this oscillatory pattern to an interplay between calcium releasereuptake mechanisms (22). Treatment of cells with a threshold dose of 1 nM carbachol produced a rapid mobilization of Ca 2ϩ i followed by an oscillatory pattern of change in Ca 2ϩ i (Fig.…”
Section: Sequence Differences Between Rat and Mouse ␤ 3 -Armentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Cells were also cotransfected with an expression construct for red fluorescent protein (DsRed) so that recordings were taken from identified, successfully transfected cells. On the basis of previous reports showing that the kinetics and temporal patterns of Ca 2ϩ i mobilization (e.g., oscillations vs. monotonic) are agonist concentration dependent (1,22,41), initial studies were conducted with CHO cells stably transformed with the M1-CHO to establish how incremental receptor activation is translated with our detection system in this cell type. A saturating concentration of carbachol (10 M) evoked a large, fourfold increase in Ca 2ϩ i followed by a fast and then slow decline of Ca 2ϩ i over the following 4 min (Fig.…”
Section: Sequence Differences Between Rat and Mouse ␤ 3 -Armentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Culture dishes were then washed three times in HBSS and mounted onto the microscope stage (Nikon). Fluo-3 fluorescence was measured in these cells using an excitation filter of 495 nm on the selection illuminator (Illuminator D6), an emitter of 520 nm, and a low light camera (Photometrics) interfaced with the microscope and controlled by Metamorph software as described previously [Hermann et al, 2005].…”
Section: Measurement Of Intracellular Free Calcium Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%