Zytogenetische Untersuchungen bei Ehepaaren mit habituellen Aborten

Breuker, K. H.; Winkhaus-Schindl, I; Citoler, P

doi:10.1007/bf00679506

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Schmid, 1962Rowley et al, 1963Wingate, 1965Singh etal., 1966McKay et al, 1967Makino, 1967Shaw, 1967Stenchever et al, 1968Wilson, 1969Kulazhenko et al, 1972Lucas et al, 1972Rott etal, 1972Waiter & Foussereau, 1972Bhasinefa/., 1973Kaosaar & Mikelsaar, 1973Khudr, 1974Papp etal, 1974Rani et al, 197'4 Broustet et al, 1975Korner, 1975Pernod ef al, 1975Tsenghi et al, 1976Schmidt et al, 1976Breuker et al, 1977Stenchever et al, 1977Adzicera/., 1978Heritage et al, 1978Kajii & Ferrier, 1978Lancet etal, 1978Duca etal, 1979Genest, 1979Hemming & Burns, 1979Luthyefa/., 1979 Neue/a/., 1979 Pesciae/a/., 1979 Tho etal, 1979t Bortotto et al, 1980Biihler, 1980V&edetal, 1980Schmid, 1980Subrt, 1980Ward et al, 1980 Though the suggestion ( Table 6) that the frequency of chromosome anomalies may be higher in couples of groups 2 and 3 with a mixed poor obstetric history (12-5%) than in couples experiencing only abortions (5-2%) was not significant, a similar trend was reported by Tho, Byrd & McDonough (1979), respectively 23% Table 12. Incidence of chromsome anomalies in couples with a history of two or more spontaneous abortions Autho...…”

Section: Comparison Of Cytogenetic Seriesmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…Table 10. The incidence of major chromosome anomalies in patients with repeated spontaneous abortions Author Schmid, 1962Rowley et al, 1963Wingate, 1965Singh etal., 1966McKay et al, 1967Makino, 1967Shaw, 1967Stenchever et al, 1968Wilson, 1969Kulazhenko et al, 1972Lucas et al, 1972Rott etal, 1972Waiter & Foussereau, 1972Bhasinefa/., 1973Kaosaar & Mikelsaar, 1973Khudr, 1974Papp etal, 1974Rani et al, 197'4 Broustet et al, 1975Korner, 1975Pernod ef al, 1975Tsenghi et al, 1976Schmidt et al, 1976Breuker et al, 1977Stenchever et al, 1977Adzicera/., 1978Heritage et al, 1978Kajii & Ferrier, 1978Lancet etal, 1978Duca etal, 1979Genest, 1979Hemming & Burns, 1979Luthyefa/., 1979 Neue/a/., 1979 Pesciae/a/., 1979Tho etal, 1979t Bortotto et al, 1980Biihler, 1980V&edetal, 1980Schmid, 1980Subrt, 1980Ward et al, 1980Sant-Cassia & Cooke, 1981Present study, 1981 Total…”

Section: Comparison Of Cytogenetic Seriesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Chromosome analyses in couples with repeated pregnancy loss

Andrews

Roberts

1982

J. Biosoc. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cytogenetic investigations were undertaken on 120 couples in Newcastle with repeated pregnancy loss for which no anatomical or other obvious reason could be established. The level of major chromosome anomalies was high, with 6-7% of couples showing one member with an abnormal karyotype. One major anomaly occurred in a control series of 240 random newborns. The couples also showed an elevated incidence of chromosomal heteromorphisms. Similar studies in the literature are reviewed. It seems that major chromosome anomalies make an appreciable contribution to repeated reproductive loss, but proof of the involvement of minor chromosome variants though suspected is less clear.

show abstract

Section: Comparison Of Cytogenetic Seriesmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Comparison Of Cytogenetic Seriesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Chromosome analyses in couples with repeated pregnancy loss

Andrews

Roberts

1982

J. Biosoc. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Incidence of chromosomal rearrangements in couples with reproductive loss

et al. 1980

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We report on 50 couples with reproductive loss did not have any detectable chromosome abnormality. A history of a previous child with multiple congenital abnormalities may be significant in identifying couples with a structural rearrangement. Only by studying more families can this hypothesis be tested. Studies of abortus tissue reveal a high percentage of chromosome abnormalities but a very low incidence of unbalanced translocations. Cytogenetic studies are indicated in a couple which has a past history of spontaneous abortions and a previous child with multiple congenital anomalies.

show abstract

Chromosomal findings in 164 couples with repeated spontaneous abortions: with special consideration to prior reproductive history

Schwartz

Palmer

1983

Hum Genet

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The cytogenetic evaluation of 164 couples who experienced repeated spontaneous abortions revealed 11 chromosomal abnormalities (10 translocations and 1 sex chromosome mosaic, 6.70%). An apparent positive relationship between the frequency of chromosome anomalies and the number of spontaneous abortions was observed. Couples with at least one normal liveborn child, in addition to the spontaneous abortions, had a significant increase in chromosomal abnormalities (17.85%) when compared with those with no liveborn offspring (4.41%) (P less than 0.005). Similarly, couples whose fetal wastage consisted of only first trimester spontaneous abortions had a greater increase in the frequency of chromosomal abnormalities (8.03% vs 0.00%).

show abstract

Zytogenetische Untersuchungen bei Ehepaaren mit habituellen Aborten

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Chromosome analyses in couples with repeated pregnancy loss

Chromosome analyses in couples with repeated pregnancy loss

Incidence of chromosomal rearrangements in couples with reproductive loss

Chromosomal findings in 164 couples with repeated spontaneous abortions: with special consideration to prior reproductive history

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About