2011
DOI: 10.5771/9783845229782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zwischen Langeweile und Extremen: Die Bundestagswahl 2009

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As official statistics on religious denominations or church attendance do not exist at the constituency level, the religiousness of the electoral district represented by an MP can only be estimated. We use data collected by the German Longitudinal Election Study (GLES) for the 2009 Bundestag Election (Rattinger et al ) in combination with a recently developed statistical model that allows reliable measures for small geographic entities to be derived from sparse survey data (Selb and Munzert ) . Our measure of church attendance thus reflects the approximate share of voters in a constituency that attends a church service at least once a month…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As official statistics on religious denominations or church attendance do not exist at the constituency level, the religiousness of the electoral district represented by an MP can only be estimated. We use data collected by the German Longitudinal Election Study (GLES) for the 2009 Bundestag Election (Rattinger et al ) in combination with a recently developed statistical model that allows reliable measures for small geographic entities to be derived from sparse survey data (Selb and Munzert ) . Our measure of church attendance thus reflects the approximate share of voters in a constituency that attends a church service at least once a month…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note: Author's own calculations based on the GLES online tracking studies t11, t15, t18, t25, t29, t33, t37 (ZA5344, ZA5348, ZA5351, ZA5725, ZA5729, ZA5733, ZA6817; Rattinger et al 2015aRattinger et al , 2015bRattinger et al , 2014Rattinger et al , 2015cRoßteutscher et al 2016a). The percentages represent respondents who felt strongly and very strongly towards Angela Merkel in respect to their anger and enthusiasm towards her.…”
Section: Self-reported Feelings Towards Angela Merkelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second analysis focuses on the micro level and aims to assess the theoretical chain underlying the postulated macro relationship. To achieve this aim, we use cross-sectional survey data from the GLES (Rattinger et al, 2011 and 2014) 9 and combine the pre-and post-election surveys. The surveys were conducted six weeks before and after the federal election in Germany on 27 September 2009.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%