2001
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-663-11919-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zur Theorie der Informationsgesellschaft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…There is consensus though in relating this one to the computer, that is to say, to the possibilities of microelectronics and thus information technology to automate production processes [1,2], but still its scope delimitation is unclear. There are those like Bell, who place it at the end of the 1960s with the arrival of computers [3] while others place it at the beginning of the Internet in 1989 [4]. There are even those who see the digital age -which beginning can be defined not with the appearance of microcontrollers nor internet but as the moment in which more information is communicated digitally (1993) or more data is recorded digitally than analogically (2002) -as a second stage of the third revolution, and not as a transformation of its own.…”
Section: A Chronology That Evolves Towards Indefinitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is consensus though in relating this one to the computer, that is to say, to the possibilities of microelectronics and thus information technology to automate production processes [1,2], but still its scope delimitation is unclear. There are those like Bell, who place it at the end of the 1960s with the arrival of computers [3] while others place it at the beginning of the Internet in 1989 [4]. There are even those who see the digital age -which beginning can be defined not with the appearance of microcontrollers nor internet but as the moment in which more information is communicated digitally (1993) or more data is recorded digitally than analogically (2002) -as a second stage of the third revolution, and not as a transformation of its own.…”
Section: A Chronology That Evolves Towards Indefinitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sociological point of reference of this model is the metaphor of the digital information society as a society, in which purpose‐oriented knowledge and the new information technology as the means of its supply possesses great significance (Steinbicker, 2001; Webster, 2002). In public perception, the transition to this stage is particularly connected with the rapidly increasing number of internet users.…”
Section: Electronic Governmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entscheidungsmacht verkörpert sich vor allem in der Gestalt des Experten, der paradigmatisch für moderne Wissensgesellschaften und postindustrieller Ökonomien ist. In der postkapitalistischen Wissensgesellschaft Peter Druckers und bei Helmut Willke bilden die »Wissensarbeiter« (Steinbicker 2001: 38 f., Willke 2002 Weitere 20 % seien von der Wissensgesellschaft »überfordert«, während ein weites Feld von 60 % in Bezug auf die Qualifikation differenziert sei, in dem es wesentlich auf die Möglichkeit und Fähigkeit des Einzelnen, sich weiterzubilden, ankäme (ebd.). Daran schließt die Frage an, ob bzw.…”
Section: Wissen Information Und Machtunclassified