1926
DOI: 10.1007/bf01283846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zur Korrespondenz zweier Klassen von Limitierungsverfahren

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1956
1956
1968
1968

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the reverse of a (JV, p n ) method is (N, p n ), it follows that a matrix is both (N, p n ) and Hausdorff if and only if the matrix of the reverse transformation is both Norlund and Hausdorff. The result of Theorem 5 can then be deduced directly from the results of [1] and [16].…”
Section: Corollary 2 Let {P N } Be a Positive Non-decreasing Sequencmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the reverse of a (JV, p n ) method is (N, p n ), it follows that a matrix is both (N, p n ) and Hausdorff if and only if the matrix of the reverse transformation is both Norlund and Hausdorff. The result of Theorem 5 can then be deduced directly from the results of [1] and [16].…”
Section: Corollary 2 Let {P N } Be a Positive Non-decreasing Sequencmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ullrich [16] showed that the only Norlund matrices which are also Hausdorff matrices are the Cesaro matrices. Agnew re-proved this result in [1].…”
Section: Corollary 2 Let {P N } Be a Positive Non-decreasing Sequencmentioning
confidence: 99%