1965
DOI: 10.1007/bf00279122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zur Genetik der progressiven Myoklonusepilepsien (Unverricht-Lundborg)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings were confirmed on electron microscopy. The same two patients are also described in papers by Vogel et al [31], Diebold et al [8] and Diebold [7].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…These findings were confirmed on electron microscopy. The same two patients are also described in papers by Vogel et al [31], Diebold et al [8] and Diebold [7].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Pleurotus ostreatus maintained on a potato agardextrose (PAD) 32 medium was grown in submerged culture in Erlenmeyer flasks (1 L) containing 200 mL of Vogel 33 basal medium made of a minimal salts medium, 1% m/v glucose and 0.2% m/v yeast extract for 7 days at 28 ºC, and shaken continuously at 180 rpm. Cell-free culture filtrates were obtained by centrifugation, then dialyzed against de-ionized water and freeze dried.…”
Section: Crude Laccase Extract Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining cases, the atypical ones, defectively known or too few in number, should simply be lumped together until experience and knowledge have grown sufficiently for the separation of some new entity. In that group we would lump our "atypical" female patient described on p. 389, the brothers reported as Lundborg's type by Vogel et al (1965) and later described in detail by Kraus-Ruppert et al (1970), the patient of Dastur et al (1966), referred to by Diebold (1972) as a late type of the Lafora group, and the patients of Riehl et al (1967 andBrown et al 1 9 6 Q Klein et al (1968) and Bergener & Gerhard (1970). These patients were atypical not only in clinical features but also, as far as we can judge, regarding histological data (Haltia, personal communication 1978).…”
Section: Nosological Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%