Zur Beteiligung junger Migrantinnen und Migranten am Vereinssport

Mutz, Michael; Burrmann, Ulrike

doi:10.1007/978-3-658-06397-9_3

Cited by 20 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Moderating effects on the relationship of migration status and physical activity based on gender and age have not been found. This contradicts previous studies which described disadvantages in physical activity participation particularly in migrant girls (and simultaneously higher proportions of sport club participation among migrant as compared to non-migrant boys) [20, 45]. This highlights the role of intersectionality and calls for the identification of intersectional differences in physical activity [46], because instead of differences between migrant and non-migrant youth there might be disadvantages in specific sub-groups of migrants that for instance concern a specific age or gender.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 90%

“…It has been shown that migrant children and adolescents were less likely to participate in physical activity in sports clubs regardless of age, gender and socioeconomic profiles. Previous studies conducted in Germany also confirmed that migrant adolescents were underprivileged with regard to sports clubs participation and postulated that aspects like cultural differences, socioeconomic disadvantages, intergenerational inheritance of sports engagement, and ethnic discrimination are responsible for generating inequalities [20, 45]. However, these studies strongly stressed that disadvantages in physical activity participation in sports clubs vary by gender.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

“…Previous research examining physical activity among migrants and non-migrants in German-speaking countries is scarce: Migrant children and adolescents tend to be less physically active than their non-migrant counterparts [ 17 , 18 ]. Analyses based on representative population data from Germany show that the percentage of children and adolescents who engage in regular sports activities in organized clubs are considerably lower among migrants than non-migrants, which is particularly true for girls [ 19 – 22 ]: While migrant adolescent girls were less likely to participate in sports in organized clubs than non-migrant adolescent girls [ 20 ], they were much more likely to walk to school [ 21 ]. In other European countries, migrant children have also been found to be more often active commuters to school than native children [ 23 , 24 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Are there disparities in different domains of physical activity between school-aged migrant and non-migrant children and adolescents? Insights from Germany

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundLarge proportions of the populations in many European countries, including Germany, are migrants. Migrant children and adolescents tend to be less physically active than their non-migrant peers. However, current research is limited as it does not sufficiently consider different domains of physical activity. Using a representative dataset, the present study examines the patterns of sports participation and other domains of physical activity among migrant and non-migrant children and adolescents residing in Germany.MethodsNationwide data from the Motorik-Modul (MoMo) Study is used. Five different domains of physical activity participation (sports clubs, outside of sports clubs, extra-curricular physical activity, physical activity, outdoor play and active commuting to school) were compared between children and adolescents with no, one-sided and two-sided migration background using logistic regression adjusted for demographic factors. Interaction terms were included in order to examine whether difference between the three groups differ by age and gender.ResultsInformation on n = 3,323 children and adolescents was available. As compared to non-migrants, children and adolescents with a two-sided migration background had a 40% (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.60, 95%-CI: 0.44–0.81), those with a one-sided migration background a 26% (aOR = 0.74, 95%-CI: 0.55-<1.00) lower chance of participating in sport club activities. In contrast, children and adolescents with a two-sided migration background were at 65% higher chance of participating in extra-curricular physical activity than non-migrants (OR = 1.65, 95%-CI: 1.15–2.36).ConclusionThe study shows that differences in levels of physical activity between migrant and non-migrant children and adolescents are less pronounced than previous research has suggested. In particular, it reveals that migrants are only disadvantaged regarding participation in sports clubs whereas they fare better with respect to extra-curricular physical activity. Interventions should therefore address barriers migrant children and adolescents encounter in the access to sport clubs while maintaining their high level of extra-curricular physical activity.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 90%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Are there disparities in different domains of physical activity between school-aged migrant and non-migrant children and adolescents? Insights from Germany

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There is a negative impact on the maintenance of an activity when adolescents no longer connect the satisfaction of their needs with playing football in a club, and therefore, a lack of motivation. Dropouts attain comparatively high ratings in this category (Calvo,2 Secondary studies of data from representative population and youth surveys such as Shell Study, PISA, DJI (e.g., Baur & Burrmann, 2003, Burrmann & Baur, 2004, Mutz & Burrmann, 2015, available youth sport surveys such as SPRINT, The German Youth Sport Survey (e.g., Mutz & Burrmann, 2011;Wattie et al, 2014) show that organised sport has lost little of its attractivity for young people over time (Baur & Burrmann, 2003).…”

Section: Intrapersonal Conditionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

What is influencing the dropout behaviour of youth players from organised football?

Schlesinger

Löbig²,

Ehnold³

et al. 2018

Ger J Exerc Sport Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…B. die Bewegungskompetenz der Frauen) im Rahmen eines partizipativen Ansatzes (kooperative Planung [27]) betrachtet und angesteuert. Im Vordergrund stand die Selbstwirksamkeit [31] und das Wissen um gesundheitsförderliche Aspekte, da teilnehmende Frauen oft wenig Kenntnisse über die positiven Effekte körperlicher Aktivität hatten oder mit dem Konzept "Freizeitsport" kulturell nicht vertraut waren [22].…”

Section: Das Big-projektunclassified

Der Capability-Ansatz in der Bewegungsförderung

Till

Omar²,

Gelius³

2022

Präv Gesundheitsf

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Die Befähigung verschiedener Zielgruppen und der Abbau gesundheitlicher Ungleichheit stehen bei Projekten der Bewegungsförderung häufig im Fokus. Die dabei oft als theoretische Basis eingesetzten Determinanten- und Empowerment-Ansätze weisen in der konkreten Projektarbeit jedoch Nachteile auf. Als Alternative hat in den letzten Jahren der Capability-Ansatz (CA) eine zunehmende Verbreitung gefunden. Bisher haben allerdings nur wenige Arbeiten untersucht, welche Vorzüge dieser Ansatz hat und wie er sich in Projekten der Gesundheitsförderung einsetzen lässt. Ziel Dieser Beitrag soll aufzeigen, wie der CA für die Evaluation bereits abgeschlossener Interventionen der Bewegungsförderung nutzbar gemacht werden kann, Wirkungen in verschiedenen Bereichen sichtbar macht und sie in Beziehung zueinander setzt. Methodik und Material Mithilfe des CA wurde die Arbeit des Projekts exemplarisch evaluiert. Dafür wurden über einen Zeitraum von 16 Jahren entstandene Projektpublikationen (n = 37) einer systematischen Dokumentenanalyse unterzogen. Ergebnis Die Einordnung des Projekts in ein Capability-Modell illustriert das breite Spektrum von Ergebnissen einer partizipativen Intervention zur Bewegungsförderung auf verschiedenen Ebenen. Der Ansatz ermöglicht es zudem, die Verbindungen von Verhaltens- und Verhältnisebene sowie zwischen der „Zielgruppe“ und Multiplikator:innen im Setting zu veranschaulichen. Schlussfolgerung Der CA ermöglicht Projekten der Bewegungsförderung eine systematische Betrachtung von Wirkungen auf Verhaltens- und Verhältnisebene, und nimmt neben dem Individuum auch das Kollektiv in den Blick. Er bietet somit die Chance, Empowerment- und Determinantenansätze der Ungleichheitsforschung systematisch zu verbinden und für die Projektevaluation nutzbar zu machen.

show abstract

Zur Beteiligung junger Migrantinnen und Migranten am Vereinssport

Cited by 20 publications

References 13 publications

Are there disparities in different domains of physical activity between school-aged migrant and non-migrant children and adolescents? Insights from Germany

Are there disparities in different domains of physical activity between school-aged migrant and non-migrant children and adolescents? Insights from Germany

What is influencing the dropout behaviour of youth players from organised football?

Der Capability-Ansatz in der Bewegungsförderung

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About