Zur Bedeutung von Leitlinien für die Rehabilitation

Abstract

Clinical practice guidelines are relevant to all parties involved in the health system. For rehabilitation under the German pension insurance scheme, there are two main aspects: the integration of rehabilitation into the curative guidelines in terms of "local tailoring" on the one hand and the development of guidelines for rehabilitative processes, demand-oriented control of rehabilitation access, and rehabilitative aftercare on the other hand. The elaboration of effective standards is aimed at avoiding over-provision, under-provision or misdirected provision of care and, simultaneously, at ensuring that quality assured treatment is offered to the rehabilitees. Also, it is intended to increasingly implement evidence-based medicine in a sector of the health system in which research has so far been underrepresented. Implementation of guidelines in the rehabilitative sector will allow to disseminate existing knowledge in targeted manner, to systematically fill the gaps and to broaden the knowledge base as a whole. Furthermore, guidelines can facilitate integration of the different sectors in health care provision by operationalising the interfaces both with curative medicine and primary prevention. Throughout the process of guideline development for rehabilitation the specific characteristics of this sector must be kept in mind. Since therapeutic interventions are multidisciplinary and multimodal in nature guidelines have to be comprehensible and applicable for all members of the multiprofessional team. Corresponding to the relative paucity in rehabilitation research there is no sufficient evidence base for numerous therapeutic interventions. Accordingly, guidelines in rehabilitation will--initially--consist of a mixture of evidence- and consensus-based recommendations. Also, the specific goal of rehabilitation under the German pension insurance scheme, namely maintenance or recovery of the capacity at work, has to be borne in mind. There are many initiatives by the providers of rehabilitation as well as the scientific medical societies to develop and implement rehabilitative clinical practice guidelines, e. g. the guidelines programme of the BfA (Federal Insurance Institute for Salaried Employees), which is aimed at developing rehabilitation process guidelines for selected indications, the guidelines activities of the VDR (Federation of German Pension Insurance Institutes), and the input of the "Guidelines" commission of the DGRW (German Society of Rehabilitation Science). It is hoped that in the years to come the parties involved in German health care provision will be open to the advantages of clinical practice guidelines. Rehabilitation under the German pension insurance scheme, with respect to its experience with quality assurance, its responsibilities for structure and concept and a growing acceptance on the part of care providers, already holds a well-founded starting position.

Leitlinientreue

“…Seit Jahren besch ä ftigt sich die Deutsche Rentenversicherung intensiv mit der Thematik sozialmedizinischer Leitlinien [13] . Ihrerseits wurde schon im Laufe der letzten Jahre eine Reihe von Leitlinien zur Leistungsbeurteilung und Rehabilitationsbed ü rftigkeit erarbeitet.…”

Effektivität psychosozialer Behandlungsmethoden zur medizinischen Rehabilitation alkoholabhängiger Patienten

“…Therapieevaluation der Suchtbehandlung wurde in den 70er− Jahren in den USA begonnen [4] [5]. Zurzeit werden Projekte zu koro− narer Herzkrankheit [6,7], chronischem Rückenschmerz [8], Dia− betes mellitus [9], Schlaganfall [10], Mammakarzinom und Alko− holabhängigkeit durchgeführt.…”

Ein Blick hinter die Kulissen: Leitlinie ¿Kreuzschmerzen¿

“…Eine Abstimmung mit der DEGAM-LL und der Versuch einer Schnittstellendefinition sind vereinbart. Auch für die Rehabilitation von Rückenschmerzpatienten sollen LL entwickelt werden, die eine Abstimmung mit den LL der ambulanten Versorgung vorsehen [15,16]. Eine LL, die nur auf eine Berufsgruppe oder eine Versorgungsebene abzielt, ohne mit den anderen Beteiligten abgestimmt zu sein, wird insbesondere bei der Versorgung chronischer Rückenschmerzpatienten nur wenig zur Verbesserung der Versorgung beitragen können.…”