1974
DOI: 10.1007/bf00411318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zur Auswertung des Elektrookulogramms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1976
1976
1984
1984

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Large variability of the results may be a combined effect of various causes difficult to control like the preceding adaptation state of the eyes, ocular protrusion, differences in electrode positions and in resistance of the skin and the periorbital tissues. Also Number of eyes studied 1974Jones et al 1977Kolb 1965Krogh 1977avan Lith & Balik 1970Lobes 1978Markoff et al 1981Pinckers 1979Reeser et al 1970Zonneveldt & van Lith 1980 the common stimulants tobacco and coffee are shown to have effect on EOG (Schmidt 1976). Due to the large scatter in results EOG is considered rather a qualitative than a quantitative test (Krogh 1977b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large variability of the results may be a combined effect of various causes difficult to control like the preceding adaptation state of the eyes, ocular protrusion, differences in electrode positions and in resistance of the skin and the periorbital tissues. Also Number of eyes studied 1974Jones et al 1977Kolb 1965Krogh 1977avan Lith & Balik 1970Lobes 1978Markoff et al 1981Pinckers 1979Reeser et al 1970Zonneveldt & van Lith 1980 the common stimulants tobacco and coffee are shown to have effect on EOG (Schmidt 1976). Due to the large scatter in results EOG is considered rather a qualitative than a quantitative test (Krogh 1977b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%