1994
DOI: 10.1002/best.199400360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zugtragverhalten von Beton nach langandauernder statischer sowie schwellender Zugvorbelastung.

Abstract: Über den Einfluß der Zugvorbelastung auf die Zugfestigkeit im einaxialen verformungsgesteuerten Zugversuch.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the following, this value will be designated as the fracture tensile strength f ct,f . Previous experimental investigations (e.g., [17,20]) show a difference between the distribution of the tensile strength within a specimen and the distribution of the fracture tensile strength f ct,f . Regarding this point, Empelmann [3] defined a term for the specimen tensile strength f ct , which is explained below.…”
Section: Distribution Of Tensile Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following, this value will be designated as the fracture tensile strength f ct,f . Previous experimental investigations (e.g., [17,20]) show a difference between the distribution of the tensile strength within a specimen and the distribution of the fracture tensile strength f ct,f . Regarding this point, Empelmann [3] defined a term for the specimen tensile strength f ct , which is explained below.…”
Section: Distribution Of Tensile Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%