2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.06.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zooplankton in Adriatic port environments: Indigenous communities and non-indigenous species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Venice lagoon, A. tonsa is currently considered a stabilized species. The most plausible hypotheses about the introduction of this species are that it was brought into the outer port area thanks to its ability to produce resting eggs, then via ballast water from ships [51][52][53], or released by aquaculture, fisheries, or pet industries [54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the Venice lagoon, A. tonsa is currently considered a stabilized species. The most plausible hypotheses about the introduction of this species are that it was brought into the outer port area thanks to its ability to produce resting eggs, then via ballast water from ships [51][52][53], or released by aquaculture, fisheries, or pet industries [54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reports of new NIS in the Venice lagoon-the copepods Pseudiaptomus marinus Sato (1913), Oithona davisae Ferrari F.D. and Orsi (1984), and ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi A. Agassiz (1865) [53,78]-are also very recent. The latter, reported for the first time in the lagoon in 2016, is still present throughout the year, and its strong predator characteristics on the planktonic component [78] could revolutionize again the structure of the Acartia genus and in general of the zooplankton communities in a few years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the authors reported the presence of the species in all Italian and Slovenian ports surveyed, as well as in the Port of Pula in Croatia. Furthermore, VIDJAK et al (2019) assessing zooplankton diversity in eastern Adriatic ports, including the Ports of Pula, Šibenik and Split, did not also report M. gigas larvae. It should be emphasized, though, that their results were based on micro-scopic analysis, which are not able to accurately identify bivalve larvae to species level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, the presence of the international harbour in the Izmir Bay suggests that the individuals may have been transported by ballast waters from different regions and may have dispersed from the bay to the adjacent stations such as the Karaburun and Ildır coasts. In many studies, it is emphasized that the main route of this species is ballast waters (Cordell, Bollens, Draheim, & Systema, ; Cornils & Wend‐Heckmann, ; Vidjak et al, ; Yıldız et al, ). The invasive O. davisae has successfully settled in transitional ecosystems, such as Lakes Faro and Ganziri and the Golden Horn Estuary (Isinibilir, Svetlichny, & Hubareva, ; Zagami et al, ), and has dominated zooplankton communities with their increasing numbers in certain periods (Zagami et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few specimens of O. davisae were observed in 2008 in Marmara Sea (Kurt, ), and a high abundance of the species was reported in September 2014 in Büyükçekmece Bay of the Marmara Sea (Doğan & İşinibilir Okyar, ). This species was recognized in 2000 in the Barcelona Port (Razouls et al, –2019; Saiz et al, ) in the western Mediterranean Sea, and it was recently reported in Lakes Faro and Ganzirri in the central Mediterranean Sea (Zagami et al, ) and in the Venice Port in the eastern Mediterranean Sea (Vidjak et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%