1991
DOI: 10.4319/lo.1991.36.1.0064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zooplankton effects on phytoplankton in lakes of contrasting trophic status

Abstract: Studies were carried out in three lakes of strongly contrasting trophic state to evaluate how the effects of zooplankton on phytoplankton vary as a function of lake productivity. Chlorophyll and total P concentrations differed by 2-3 orders of magnitude among ultra-oligotrophic Lake Tahoe, meso-oligotrophic Castle Lake, and strongly eutrophic Clear Lake. Three experimental designs involving short-term (4 d) manipulations of nutrients, ambient zooplankton, and the common crustacean grazer Duphnia were performed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
118
4
8

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
12
118
4
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it seems that the importance of herbivores as a control of organic carbon recycling and storage as autotrophic biomass, which is reflected by the percentage of primary production consumed (Cebrian and Duarte 1994;Sterner et al 1997;Cebrian 1999), decreases in more productive communities when different types or only communities of coastal phytoplankton or microphytobenthos are compared. Previous comparisons of planktonic communities also suggest this hypothesis (Eppley 1981;Elser and Goldman 1991). Moreover, because it seems possible that the efficiency of herbivore production does not vary systematically among different types of marine communities (Schroeder 1981), herbivore production may be expected to increase as a decreasing percentage of primary production across community types or within communities of coastal phytoplankton and microphytobenthos.…”
Section: Consumption By Herbivoresmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Therefore, it seems that the importance of herbivores as a control of organic carbon recycling and storage as autotrophic biomass, which is reflected by the percentage of primary production consumed (Cebrian and Duarte 1994;Sterner et al 1997;Cebrian 1999), decreases in more productive communities when different types or only communities of coastal phytoplankton or microphytobenthos are compared. Previous comparisons of planktonic communities also suggest this hypothesis (Eppley 1981;Elser and Goldman 1991). Moreover, because it seems possible that the efficiency of herbivore production does not vary systematically among different types of marine communities (Schroeder 1981), herbivore production may be expected to increase as a decreasing percentage of primary production across community types or within communities of coastal phytoplankton and microphytobenthos.…”
Section: Consumption By Herbivoresmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Despite the possible effect of toxins and even the low nutritional value of the available food (Von Elert et al 2005) it also appears that the cyanobacteria biomass is extremely high so that the potential top-down effect may never be felt. Elser & Goldman (1991) showed that algal control by grazing was reduced in systems with higher trophic levels. Some studies in tropical regions have also found a weak relationship between phytoplankton and zooplankton in more eutrophic conditions (Von Rückert & Giani 2008), even for species other than cyanobacteria.…”
Section: Zooplankton and Shifts In Cyanobacteria Dominancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…En revanche, l'effet des poissons (ou de la structure des réseaux trophiques : absence ou présence de grands herbivores) sur la biomasse algale s'avère toujours statistiquement indépendant de celui des nutriments, tel que démontré par MAZUMDER (1994a) et BRETT et GOLDMAN (1997). Ceci amène à considérer les hypothèses d'atténuation des effets des prédateurs (McQUEEN et ai, 1986 ;ELSER et GOLDMAN, 1991) ou les hypothèses reliant l'effet des res-sources à la longueur des chaînes trophiques (PERSSON et ai, 1988) comme peu probables dans les lacs dominés par des poissons chassant à vue. Très peu d'expériences factorielles croisant nutriments x poissons ont été réalisées avec des poissons ayant un comportement plus opportuniste de filteur omnivore tels que gardons (LACROIX et LESCHER-MOUTOUE, 1991 ;LACROIX et ai, 1996) et alose à gésier (DRENNER et al, 1996).…”
Section: Tableauunclassified
“…Ainsi, on a successivement proposé que les effets top-down des poissons étaient plus prononcés dans les lacs oligotrophes (McQUEEN étal., 1986) ou mésotrophes (ELSER et GOLDMAN, 1991), ou encore dans les lacs eutrophes pauvres en macrophytes (SARNELLE, 1996;JEPESSEN étal., 1997). Dernièrement, MAZUMDER (1994c) a proposé un modèle non linéaire intégrant les effets combinés des ressources et de la structure des réseaux trophiques pour prédire les variations dans la biomasse du plancton en fonction de l'état trophique des lacs (modèle d: fig.2).…”
Section: Echelles Spatiales Processus Abiotiques Processus Biotiques unclassified