2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-010-0413-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zooplankton contribution to the particulate N and P in Lake Kinneret, Israel, under changing water levels

Abstract: The association of water level changes and the relative (%) contributions of crustacean zooplankton to particulate N (PNz) and particulate P (PPz) in Lake Kinneret, Israel were studied. The PNz and PPz were assessed for a period of 10 years (1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008) in relation to water level (WL) changes which occurred during that period. We estimated PNz and PPz, based on crustacean N and P content measured seasonally over 2 years, and a 10-year record of zooplankton densit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2; Zohary et al 1994Zohary et al 1989Zohary et al -1992 Peridinium Fig. 2; Zohary et al 1994Zohary et al 2008Zohary et al -2010 non-Peridinium This study Table 1. Sources of δ 13 C data for particulate organic matter from surface water (POMsurf), particulate organic matter from sediment trap (POMtraps), and zooplankton from Lake Kinneret; years of data collection; and whether Peridinium gatunense bloomed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2; Zohary et al 1994Zohary et al 1989Zohary et al -1992 Peridinium Fig. 2; Zohary et al 1994Zohary et al 2008Zohary et al -2010 non-Peridinium This study Table 1. Sources of δ 13 C data for particulate organic matter from surface water (POMsurf), particulate organic matter from sediment trap (POMtraps), and zooplankton from Lake Kinneret; years of data collection; and whether Peridinium gatunense bloomed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The different mesh size nets were used to ensure sufficient collection of both cladocerans and copepods. In the laboratory, zooplankton were cleaned from other particles in the net tows by letting them swim to the light (Rachamim et al 2010). This light-dark separation process would usually last between 1.5 and 3 h and was sufficient for gut clearance prior to stable isotope analysis (Feuchtmayr andGrey 2003, Smyntek et al 2007).…”
Section: Zooplanktonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the dry weight (DW) of zooplankton is 10-20% of the WW [2,6,8] the DW biomass of the zooplankton compartment range in Lake Kinneret is 250-1700 tons. Taking into account the published data [17][18][19][20] on Carbon (C), Nitrogen (N) and Phosphorus (P), their content ranges (48%, 9%, 1% of DW respectively) in the Lake Kinneret zooplankton are 120-860 tons, 23-153 tons and 2.5-17.0 tons respectively. These nutrient loads are small in relation to the total stocks, but they might have a significant role due to the high rate of nutrient recycling by zooplankton.…”
Section: Total Load Of Zooplankton Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our two sub-models, the stoichiometry of zooplankton was fixed because zooplankton have fairly constant internal N:P ratios (Sterner and Elser, 2002), although some variability has been reported in Lake Kinneret (Rachamim et al, 2010). In addition, the presence of the microbial loop affects the zooplankton community structure (Peduzzi et al, 1992).…”
Section: N:p Stoichiometry Of the Microbial Loopmentioning
confidence: 99%