2013
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1208059110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zoonosis emergence linked to agricultural intensification and environmental change

Abstract: A systematic review was conducted by a multidisciplinary team to analyze qualitatively best available scientific evidence on the effect of agricultural intensification and environmental changes on the risk of zoonoses for which there are epidemiological interactions between wildlife and livestock. The study found several examples in which agricultural intensification and/or environmental change were associated with an increased risk of zoonotic disease emergence, driven by the impact of an expanding human popu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
620
3
29

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 779 publications
(662 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
7
620
3
29
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority originated from animal hosts (Jones et al 2008) and emerged in 55 tropical Africa (Chan et al 2010). A major driver for disease emergence was likely the modification 56 and intensification of agriculture, since it resulted in novel wildlife-livestock-human interactions 57 (Pearce-Duvet 2006;Jones et al 2013). It has been shown that livestock can play key roles as 58 intermediate host for the transmission of wildlife pathogens to humans (Daszak et al 2000;Wood et 59 al.…”
Section: Introduction 52 53mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority originated from animal hosts (Jones et al 2008) and emerged in 55 tropical Africa (Chan et al 2010). A major driver for disease emergence was likely the modification 56 and intensification of agriculture, since it resulted in novel wildlife-livestock-human interactions 57 (Pearce-Duvet 2006;Jones et al 2013). It has been shown that livestock can play key roles as 58 intermediate host for the transmission of wildlife pathogens to humans (Daszak et al 2000;Wood et 59 al.…”
Section: Introduction 52 53mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is much to learn about how different animal husbandry practices, land uses, and incursions into wildlife habitat affect the development and transmission of new zoonotic infections (105). This understanding will be important to the development of more effective surveillance approaches.…”
Section: Moving Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current focus on wildlife health surveillance is primarily on human and livestock diseases that are outside the domestic and domiciled environments[65]. This emphasizes a lack of appreciation for the role that sylvatic ecosystems have in the development of zoonotic diseases[28, 66]. To carry out effective wildlife surveillance of emerging infectious diseases that are zoonotic or otherwise, there is a requirement to apply a systematic collaborative approach with veterinarians, ecologists, medical doctors, wildlife biologists, microbiologists and molecular biologists[67].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%