2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10437-021-09429-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zooarchaeology of the Middle Stone Age in Magubike Rockshelter, Iringa Region, Tanzania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, from eastern to western Africa, understanding the nature of the relationship between the MSA and LSA remains incomplete, with little consensus on issues ranging from timing to geography to technology. Understanding the temporal and spatial variation in technologies (51)(52)(53), subsistence (54), mobility (55,56), and potential ecosystem modifications (57) of Middle and Late Pleistocene human populations is best accomplished via comprehensive research on stratified, calibrated sequences of timesuccessive, geographically limited archaeological occurrences associated with skeletal remains. The rapidly expanding nexus of MSA localities in the Afar thereby creates additional opportunities for progress in testing the modes and tempos of biological and cultural change and the causes of observed variation (58)(59)(60)(61).…”
Section: Broader Implications and Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, from eastern to western Africa, understanding the nature of the relationship between the MSA and LSA remains incomplete, with little consensus on issues ranging from timing to geography to technology. Understanding the temporal and spatial variation in technologies (51)(52)(53), subsistence (54), mobility (55,56), and potential ecosystem modifications (57) of Middle and Late Pleistocene human populations is best accomplished via comprehensive research on stratified, calibrated sequences of timesuccessive, geographically limited archaeological occurrences associated with skeletal remains. The rapidly expanding nexus of MSA localities in the Afar thereby creates additional opportunities for progress in testing the modes and tempos of biological and cultural change and the causes of observed variation (58)(59)(60)(61).…”
Section: Broader Implications and Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other sites with poor preservation, NISP values are higher but identifications are only possible to body part and carcass size, and rarely taxon, limiting some kinds of interpretations. This is the case at Magubike Rockshelter (Masele and Willoughby, 2021), Mlambalasi Rockshelter (Collins and Willoughby, 2010), and open-air Loiyangalani (Masele, 2021(Masele, , 2020Thompson, 2005). LGL, Laas Geel; PEC, Porc-Epic Cave; BUL, Bubula River; FHB, Fincha Habera; MBR, Mochena Borago; KIB, Kibish Formation; RRS, Rifle Range Site; GW, Guli Waabayo; MFG, Mfangano; RUS, Rusinga; KAR, Karungu; EYM, Enkapune ya Muto; LKH, Lukenya Hill; NDU, Ndutu Beds, Olduvai Gorge; GK, Gol Kopjes; NAS, Nasera Rockshelter; MUM, Mumba Rockshelter; MGB, Magubike; KC, Kuumbi Cave; PYS, Panga ya Saidi.…”
Section: Sampling and Preservation Biasmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A third group of sites are found in higher-elevation grasslands, as in the Athi-Kapiti Plains of Kenya at the Lukenya Hill sites (GvJm19, GvJm22, GvJm46, and GvJm62) (Marean, 1992b), and in the Serengeti Plains of Tanzania at Nasera Rockshelter, Gol Kopjes, Loiyangalani, and the Ndutu Beds at Olduvai Gorge (Eren et al, 2014;Gifford-Gonzalez, 2011;Masele, 2020;Mehlman, 1989). Finally, a fourth group of sites are located in semi-wooded uplands, as at Kisese II Rockshelter in the Irangi Hills and at Magubike and Mlambalasi Rockshelters in the Iringa Highlands (Collins and Willoughby, 2010;Masele, 2017;Masele and Willoughby, 2021;Tryon et al, 2019). These biases limit our understanding of Late Pleistocene foodways in important ways.…”
Section: Biogeographic Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation