2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-014-2933-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zone-size nonuniformity of 18F-FDG PET regional textural features predicts survival in patients with oropharyngeal cancer

Abstract: ZSNU is an independent predictor of outcome in patients with advanced T-stage OPSCC, and may improve their prognostic stratification.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
60
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(51 reference statements)
6
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical outcome (DFS or OS) was significantly different in the 3 risk groups. These findings were confirmed in an independent series of 88 oropharyngeal cancer patients (Cheng et al, 2015).…”
Section: Texture and Shape Analysissupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clinical outcome (DFS or OS) was significantly different in the 3 risk groups. These findings were confirmed in an independent series of 88 oropharyngeal cancer patients (Cheng et al, 2015).…”
Section: Texture and Shape Analysissupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The choice of the threshold for either method may affect the absolute value of the MTV. Six studies compared the predictive value of MTV and/or TLG computed with different thresholds (Cheng et al, 2015;Kao et al, 2012;Lin et al, 2015;Schinagl et al, 2011;Yabuki et al, 2015). In the study by (Schinagl et al, 2011), 4 thresholds (2.5, 40%, 50% and adaptive threshold based on liver uptake) were compared for 77 patients treated with RT ± CT. MTV 40% was the strongest predictor of DFS and OS.…”
Section: Suvmax and Metabolic Tumor Volumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Textural features have been correlated to clinical data such as survival, clinical response and prognostic pathological features in cervical, head and neck, lung, esophageal, rectal, and breast cancers. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Despite the increased use of these metrics for PET imaging, relatively little is known about the impact of fundamental data acquisition and image reconstruction parameters on metric variability. The few studies to date have appropriately focused on test-retest or sensitivity studies in patient data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not every radiomic feature that significantly predicted the survival of lung cancer patients could also predict the survival of head-and-neck cancer patients and vice versa. Radiomic features are better at predicting treatment response than conventional measures, such as tumor volume and diameter, and the maximum radiotracer uptake on positron emission tomography (PET) imaging [19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Metastatic latency of tumors could also be predicted by radiomic features [26][27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%