2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zone analysis in biology articles as a basis for information extraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
76
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking premises and conclusion as given, Feng and Hirst addressed the problem of recognizing the name of the argumentation scheme for the five most frequently occurring schemes of Walton et al (2008) Text with genetics content has been the object of study in some previous NLP research. Mizuta et al (2005) investigated automatic classification of information status of text segments in genetics journal articles. The Colorado Richly Annotated Full Text Corpus (CRAFT) contains 67 full-text articles on the mouse genome that have been linguistically annotated (Verspoor et al 2012) and annotated with concepts from standard biology ontologies (Bada et al 2012).…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Taking premises and conclusion as given, Feng and Hirst addressed the problem of recognizing the name of the argumentation scheme for the five most frequently occurring schemes of Walton et al (2008) Text with genetics content has been the object of study in some previous NLP research. Mizuta et al (2005) investigated automatic classification of information status of text segments in genetics journal articles. The Colorado Richly Annotated Full Text Corpus (CRAFT) contains 67 full-text articles on the mouse genome that have been linguistically annotated (Verspoor et al 2012) and annotated with concepts from standard biology ontologies (Bada et al 2012).…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous NLP research on scientific discourse (e.g. Mizuta et al 2005;Teufel 2010;Liakata 2012a) has focused on recognizing information status (hypothesis, background knowledge, new knowledge claim, etc.) but has not addressed deeper argumentation analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of these approaches have used Semantic Web standards as the data representation model for arguments. Examples include ScholOnto [6], works presented in [14] and [45], AIF and SALT.…”
Section: Applications Of Argument Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discourse representation model proposed by de Waard and Tel [14] has an arrangement they call rhetorical block structure for scientific publications. The same authors have enriched the initial model by identifying seven basic discourse segment types: Fact, Hypothesis, Goal, Method, Result, Implication, and Problem which correspond to the ones defined by Mizuta et al [45], who performed an automatic extraction of epistemic items using automated techniques based on argumentative zoning, in a corpus of biomedical texts.…”
Section: Applications Of Argument Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the term "argument" in a related but different sense than here, researchers have investigated annotation of scientific abstracts and full-text articles (e.g. Teufel, 2002;Mizuta et al, 2005;Liakata et al, 2012). However, the annotated corpora they have created are not designed for argumentation mining in the above sense.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%