2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1385-1101(00)00004-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zonation of benthic communities in a tropical tidal flat of north-east Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
42
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
7
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The high diversity in Farakeh could be attributed to river flow with nutrients load that was in agreement with earlier reports (Saraladevi et al, 1996;Dittmann 2000;Desroy et al, 2002;Ingole et al, 2008), the high diversity in Asaluyeh it could be related to habitat heterogeneity. Sediment mixed up with fine and coarse particles tend to harbour more diverse assemblages than the sand or silt-clay alone, because they can host greater habitat diversity (Yu et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The high diversity in Farakeh could be attributed to river flow with nutrients load that was in agreement with earlier reports (Saraladevi et al, 1996;Dittmann 2000;Desroy et al, 2002;Ingole et al, 2008), the high diversity in Asaluyeh it could be related to habitat heterogeneity. Sediment mixed up with fine and coarse particles tend to harbour more diverse assemblages than the sand or silt-clay alone, because they can host greater habitat diversity (Yu et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The low abundance of macrobenthic community in the Farakeh creek (Table 2) could be attributed to the Helleh river run off that carries heavy load of sediments. Sediment load of rivers has also been blamed for the low abundance of macrobenthos in the northern creeks of Bushehr (Mirdar et al, 2009) and other parts of the world (Dittmann, 2000;Spruzen et al, 2008). Moreover, the macrobenthic assemblage in Farakeh was characterized by a higher abundance of some brackish water species, namely brackish oligochaetes, which was similar to Mogias and Kevrekidis (2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sharks use intertidal mudflats where there is an abundance of prey, especially fat innkeeper worms, but not mudflats that have a relatively depauperate prey field relative to neighboring subtidal habitats. Mudflats that experience more variable and extreme environmental conditions, such as high intertidal mudflats or mudflats in the upper region of the slough, generally harbor fewer prey items (Beukema 1976, Dittmann 2000, Wasson et al 2002 and are less frequently utilized by leopard sharks. It also appears that the size of low intertidal mudflats is important, with large areas of continuous mudflats being better shark habitat than narrow bands bordering subtidal areas.…”
Section: Habitat Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mar Ecol Prog Ser 258: [189][190][191][192][193][194][195][196][197][198][199] 2003 sandy shore habitats, often dominating benthic macrofaunal communities in terms of both numbers and biomass (Fenchel et al 1975, Wijnsma et al 1999, Dittmann 2000. Moreover, amphipods are considered to be one of the most important secondary producers (Carrasco & Arcos 1984) and a major food source for a variety of marine predators (Kline & Wood 1996, Schlacher & Wooldridge 1996, Beare & Moore 1997, MacNeil et al 1999, Takahashi et al 1999.…”
Section: Resale or Republication Not Permitted Without Written Consenmentioning
confidence: 99%