2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3432542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zombie Firms in Italy: A Critical Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This value reaches 96% for DRA-I firms (Table A.1). More than 80% of DRA firms and over 90% of CC firms are 'zombie' firms, that is businesses for which the interest coverage rate took on a value below 1 in at least one of the three years prior to the procedure (this definition has been used by Rodano and Sette, 2019). Along both dimensions, CC firms appear to be worse off than DRA firms, but DRA-I firms show values aligned with those of CC firms (in particular, notice that all DRA-I firms in our sample are 'zombies' according to the previous definition).…”
Section: Balance Sheet Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This value reaches 96% for DRA-I firms (Table A.1). More than 80% of DRA firms and over 90% of CC firms are 'zombie' firms, that is businesses for which the interest coverage rate took on a value below 1 in at least one of the three years prior to the procedure (this definition has been used by Rodano and Sette, 2019). Along both dimensions, CC firms appear to be worse off than DRA firms, but DRA-I firms show values aligned with those of CC firms (in particular, notice that all DRA-I firms in our sample are 'zombies' according to the previous definition).…”
Section: Balance Sheet Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting from the OECD definition (red line on top), we see that adding financial revenues (orange, long-dash) already has a sizeable impact on the number of firms identified as zombies. Further, using cash flows (EBITDA) rather than EBIT substantially reduces the number and importance of zombies (see also Rodano and Sette (2019) for a similar impact when applied to Italian firms). Finally, assessing cash flow deficiencies over a three-year horizon, rather than on a year-by-year basis, leads to a substantial increase in the number of zombie firms (but still substantially less than using the OECD definition).…”
Section: New Approach To Classify Zombie Firmsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Most importantly, this implies abstracting from depreciation and amortization as well as including recurring financial revenues (from liquid assets or intercompany loans, for instance). Starting from EBITDA and including recurring financial revenues, therefore, avoids wrongly classifying healthy firms as zombies: firms with recent large investments (high EBITDA, low EBIT firms (Rodano and Sette, 2019)), firms with high cash levels (typically small firms), and firms that grant intercompany loans (typically large firms).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The growth of healthy businesses is thus limited, together with the increased creation of barriers for start-ups (Caballero et al 2008). Moreover, Rodano and Sette (2019) also point out that production factors are used in inefficient firms, which reduces the allocation efficiency of the economy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%