2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-44479-5_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ZnS and ZnO Semiconductor Nanoparticles Doped with Mn2+ Ions. Size Effects Investigated by EPR Spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the typical χ para = C/T Curie-type dependence of the paramagnetic susceptibility, with C a Curie−type constant (C = NP 2 /3k B , where N is the number of paramagnetic centers, P the effective magnetic moment per paramagnetic center, and k B the Boltzmann constant), one can estimate the number N of paramagnetic centers per gram of sample (noted by n), assuming a magnetic moment of 5 μ B per Mn 2+ center, where μ B is the Bohr magneton. According to the relationship n = 3k B Tχ para /P 2 there are (2.6 ± 0.2) × 10 18 Considering the experimental errors involved (±25%) one finds a reasonable agreement between the spin concentration of the paramagnetic centers from magnetic measurements C(χ para ) = 440 ppm and the total spin concentration C is + C aggr = 370 ppm provided by EPR in the case of the sample with 2000 ppm nominal concentration. These values are also in good agreement with the concentration of incorporated manganese C AA = 455 ppm determined by elemental atomic absorption (AA) analysis using a PerkinElmer atomic absorption spectrophotometer model PINAACLE 900T and standard quantitative analysis procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using the typical χ para = C/T Curie-type dependence of the paramagnetic susceptibility, with C a Curie−type constant (C = NP 2 /3k B , where N is the number of paramagnetic centers, P the effective magnetic moment per paramagnetic center, and k B the Boltzmann constant), one can estimate the number N of paramagnetic centers per gram of sample (noted by n), assuming a magnetic moment of 5 μ B per Mn 2+ center, where μ B is the Bohr magneton. According to the relationship n = 3k B Tχ para /P 2 there are (2.6 ± 0.2) × 10 18 Considering the experimental errors involved (±25%) one finds a reasonable agreement between the spin concentration of the paramagnetic centers from magnetic measurements C(χ para ) = 440 ppm and the total spin concentration C is + C aggr = 370 ppm provided by EPR in the case of the sample with 2000 ppm nominal concentration. These values are also in good agreement with the concentration of incorporated manganese C AA = 455 ppm determined by elemental atomic absorption (AA) analysis using a PerkinElmer atomic absorption spectrophotometer model PINAACLE 900T and standard quantitative analysis procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The analysis of the electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra from Mn 2+ ions incorporated in cubic ZnS QDs has revealed the presence of isolated Mn 2+ ions localized at substitutional Zn 2+ sites in the core and on the surface of the NCs, as well as of an aggregated phase resulting in a broad, featureless Lorentzian component line, associated with exchange coupled Mn 2+ ions. In recent quantitative EPR investigations of 2.9 nm diameter cZnS:Mn QDs prepared by coprecipitation we have shown that, up to the highest nominal concentration of 50 000 ppm, the Mn 2+ ions incorporated at isolated sites in the core and on the surface in a diluted paramagnetic state characterized by magnetic dipole–dipole interactions cannot be responsible for the collective magnetism properties. , Although one would expect that the aggregated Mn 2+ ions could determine the observed collective magnetism at least below a certain temperature, to our knowledge this possibility has not been investigated so-far. In fact, practically nothing is known about the composition, structure, and physical properties of the phase responsible for the Lorentzian line, also seen in other II–VI semiconductor NCs at higher doping levels. , It is therefore essential to determine in what manner the Mn 2+ aggregated phase contributes to the reported collective magnetism properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) can detect with high sensitivity the presence and amount of paramagnetic centers, including TMIs at different lattice sites in semiconductor NCs. , Mn 2+ is the best suited TMI for such studies and has been extensively investigated in NCs of ZnS, ZnSe, ZnO, CdS, and CdSe. ,, Studies of nanocrystalline samples exhibiting well resolved EPR spectra resulted in the identification of isolated Mn 2+ ions localized in the core and in the surface layer of the host NCs, as well as of agglomerates/separate phases of Mn 2+ ions observed at higher nominal concentrations. ,,, …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emission and quantum confinement of CsPbX 3 QDs that form in Pb‒doped CsX scintillator crystals was reported in the late 1990’s 16 . For the II‒VI QDs such as ZnO, ZnS, ZnSe, CdS, CdSe there has been a strong effort to dope the QDs with transition metal (TM) ions such as Mn 2+ or Co 2+ aimed at introducing new optical and/or magnetic functionalities 17 18 19 20 21 . A large number of publications have reported different categories of doped QDs 22 23 24 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%