2014
DOI: 10.1109/jphotov.2013.2283058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zn(O, S) Buffer Layers and Thickness Variations of CdS Buffer for Cu $_{2}$ZnSnS$_{4}$ Solar Cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
59
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although short-circuit current (J sc ) can be reduced by the CBO seen from CIGS toward CdS, the CBO has an effect of increasing the open-circuit voltage (V oc ) of the CIGS solar cell. For these reasons, a thin CdS layer is introduced in the solar cell and its thickness is precisely controlled to maximize the fill factor (FF) [12,13]. However, extracting the exact E g values of the solarcell materials using the conventional optical methods is quite challenging since they usually require preparation of samples with extremely thin films which is not easily achievable in a CIGS solar cell having bulky grains, which calls for different approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although short-circuit current (J sc ) can be reduced by the CBO seen from CIGS toward CdS, the CBO has an effect of increasing the open-circuit voltage (V oc ) of the CIGS solar cell. For these reasons, a thin CdS layer is introduced in the solar cell and its thickness is precisely controlled to maximize the fill factor (FF) [12,13]. However, extracting the exact E g values of the solarcell materials using the conventional optical methods is quite challenging since they usually require preparation of samples with extremely thin films which is not easily achievable in a CIGS solar cell having bulky grains, which calls for different approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work we use 1D SCAPS [1] models to simulate the influence of CZTS absorber layer thickness on current-voltage (J-V) characteristics and compare with an empirical data set with similar thickness variations [2]. The models are minor variations to our baseline reference device model [3], built with input parameters from a reference device presented at IEEE PVSC-41 [4]. The aim of this study is to evaluate the trends induced by changing thickness, and to predict the influence of thicknesses variation, for future reference, in the limit of bulk and back contact recombination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a description of the deposition process and full device structure, see [4]. The composition of the absorber layers in the thickness series varies in Cu/Sn ratio within 1.83 -1.93, and in Zn/(Cu+Sn) ratio within 0.36 -0.41, as measured from X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For pure sulphide CZTS Ericson et al [12] showed that the sulphur ratios in ALD deposited Zn(O,S) buffer layer have large influences on solar cell device performance resulting in devices with 4.6% efficiency for an optimized composition compared to 7.3% for reference CZTS/CdS device. Nguyen et al [13] showed that thin 10-25nm ZnS buffer layer grown by and strongly depend on the absorber surface composition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%