2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2010.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zn–Ni sulfide selective precipitation: The role of supersaturation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
4
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Table 6, the REM Zn was also significantly aligned with the MOR, when the MOR was less than 2.0 and the R was 0.86. Secondly, the Cu concentration was only 5% of that in the Sampaio et al (2010) test, and it is harder for the supersaturation of the precipitate. Supersaturation, achieved by adding more sulphide, could speed up the precipitation process (Veeken et al, 2003).…”
Section: Cu Recovery From the Amdmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in Table 6, the REM Zn was also significantly aligned with the MOR, when the MOR was less than 2.0 and the R was 0.86. Secondly, the Cu concentration was only 5% of that in the Sampaio et al (2010) test, and it is harder for the supersaturation of the precipitate. Supersaturation, achieved by adding more sulphide, could speed up the precipitation process (Veeken et al, 2003).…”
Section: Cu Recovery From the Amdmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…As shown in Table 6, The REM Cu was only 36.08% when the MOR Cu was 1, and a MOR Cu of 2 was found to be the optimal value for Cu selective precipitation. However, Sampaio et al (2010) found that with a MOR of 1.1, the REM Cu was approximately 99%. The higher MOR Cu might be due to three reasons.…”
Section: Cu Recovery From the Amdmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With the UV conversion of the Fe sludge, magnetite particles could be obtained and it can be applied for the paint industry (Silva et al, 2012), while the Fe 2 O 3 content of the magnetite particles should be higher than 75%. It has been found that mostly Cu and Zn sludges and those generated in the sulfide precipitation process were covellite and spharelite (Sampaio et al, 2010), and those could be refined and sold to smelters to recover the metals (Cibati et al, 2013). Generally, the Cu and Zn contents of the sludge are about 0.5% and 2% for their flotation refinement respectively.…”
Section: Metal Recovery From the Leachatementioning
confidence: 99%