There has been renewed interest in the controlled polymerization of acrylates and other susceptible monomers using Group 4 metallocene initiators during the past five years. These complexes have been applied to the synthesis of polyacrylates and polymethacrylates, where control over molecular weight (M W ), comonomer sequence distribution, and polymer tacticity is possible in some cases. [1] Over 10 years ago we reported that a two-component initiator system comprising [Cp 2 ZrMe 2 ] (Cp = C 5 H 5 ) and [Cp 2 ZrMe(L)][X], either preformed (X = BPh 4 , L = THF) [2a] or generated in situ (X = MeB(C 6 F 5 ) 3 , B(C 6 F 5 ) 4 , L = methyl methacrylate (MMA)) [2b, c] was competent for MMA polymerization. Mechanistic work revealed that propagation involved the rate-limiting, intermolecular Michael addition of zirconocene enolate 1 (formed in situ from complex 2 and [Cp 2 ZrMe 2 ]) to MMA, activated by complexation to 2 (Scheme 1). [3] We based this mechanism on the observed polymerization kinetics using preformed neutral enolates 1 in combination with 2 (independently first order in both and zero order in [MMA]) [2c, 3] and on the observation that 2 or even a discrete cationic zirconium enolate complex, [Cp 2 Zr{OC(OMe)= CMe 2 }(thf)][BPh 4 ][3] were much less competent initiators. It occurred to us that a covalently linked, dinuclear enolate initiator might function analogously to the twocomponent systems studied earlier and could represent a new strategy [4] for the controlled polymerization of methacrylates and other susceptible monomers.We concentrated on the use of dinuclear zirconocene complexes featuring the m-oxo linkage as this unit is robust. [5,6]