Zircon U–Pb, molybdenite Re–Os and muscovite Ar–Ar isotopic dating of the Xitian W–Sn polymetallic deposit, eastern Hunan Province, South China and its geological significance

Liang, Xinmiao; Dong, Chaoge; Jiang, Ying; Wu, Shichong; Zhou, Yun; Zhu, Haofeng; Fu, Jiangang; Wang, Ce; Shan, Yehua

doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2016.03.018

Cited by 51 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 97 publications

(133 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The Xitian ore field, located in Chaling, Hunan province, is characterized by intensive and widely distributed granitoids associated with numerous non-ferrous and rare-metal minerals of Mesozoic age [19,39,44,60].…”

Section: Geological Settingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The Nanling region is famous for its large-scale and multi-stage magmatism and abundant W, Sn and other rare-metal resources and reserves [2,3,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Previous studies have revealed the presence of [2]), showing the distribution of granitic plutons, basalts, and related W-Sn deposits and their geochronological data compiled from [17][18][19]21,29,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. TB: Tarim block; CAB: Cathaysian Block; NCB: North China Block; SCB: South China Block; YZB: Yangtze Block.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These precise data provide detailed chronological constraints on the emplacement age of the Xitian pluton and for the time interval between W-Sn mineralization of the Xitian deposit. The majority of these chronological data show that the Xitian pluton could be subdivided into the Late Triassic (Indosinian) granites (230-220 Ma) and the Late Jurassic (Yanshanian) granites (160-140 Ma), and the time interval for W-Sn [2]), showing the distribution of granitic plutons, basalts, and related W-Sn deposits and their geochronological data compiled from [17][18][19]21,29,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. TB: Tarim block; CAB: Cathaysian Block; NCB: North China Block; SCB: South China Block; YZB: Yangtze Block.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A large number of studies have been carried out in the Xitian area by geochemical and isotopic methods, and these studies have shown that the formation of this deposit is genetically related to the Xitian pluton [19,28,38,39]. Many dating technologies have been applied to study the emplacement age of this pluton and metallogenic age of this deposit, including LA-ICP-MS, and ion probe by either SHRIMP or CAMECA zircon U-Pb, mica and cassiterite 40 Ar- 39 Ar, and molybdenite Re-Os isotopic techniques [19,[40][41][42]. These precise data provide detailed chronological constraints on the emplacement age of the Xitian pluton and for the time interval between W-Sn mineralization of the Xitian deposit.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…6 Ma from altered granites in the Indosinian granitic batholith, indicating a possibility for the Indosinian mineralization event in the Xitian ore field; however, this age may not represent the age of the large-scale skarn-type W-Sn mineralization in the Xitian ore field. It was proposed that the skarn occurred in the contact zone between the Yanshanian granites and the Devonian dolomitic limestone [19]. However, recent studies show that the granites belong to Indosinian granites rather than Yanshanian granites [34].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Geochronology and Genesis of the Xitian W-Sn Polymetallic Deposit in Eastern Hunan Province, South China: Evidence from Zircon U-Pb and Muscovite Ar-Ar Dating, Petrochemistry, and Wolframite Sr-Nd-Pb Isotopes

Cao

Yang

et al. 2018

Minerals

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The recently explored Xitian tungsten-tin (W-Sn) polymetallic ore field, located in Hunan province, South China, is one of the largest ore fields in the Nanling Range (NLR). Two major metallogenic types appeared in this ore field, skarn-and quartz vein-type. They are distributed within Longshang, Heshuxia, Shaiheling, Hejiangkou, Goudalan, and so on. Hydrothermal zircons from two altered granites yielded U-Pb ages of 152.8 ± 1.1 Ma, and 226.0 ± 2.8 Ma, respectively. Two muscovite samples from ore-bearing quartz vein yielded 40 Ar/ 39 Ar plateau ages of 156.6 ± 0.7 Ma, 149.5 ± 0.8 Ma, respectively. Combined with the geological evidence, two metallogenic events are proposed in the Xitian ore field, with skarn-type W-Sn mineralization in Late Triassic (Indosinian) and quartz vein/greisen type W-Sn mineralization in Late Jurassic (Yanshanian). The relatively low Ce/Ce* ratios and high Y/Ho ratios in zircons from two altered granites indicate that the hydrothermal fluids of two metallogenic events are characterized by low oxygen fugacities and enrichment in F. The similar chondrite-normalized patterns between the skarn and Xitian Indosinian granites and Sr-Nd-Pb isotopic compositions of wolframite suggest that the metal sources for both types W-Sn mineralization are derived from a crustal source.

show abstract

Section: Geological Settingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Geochronology and Genesis of the Xitian W-Sn Polymetallic Deposit in Eastern Hunan Province, South China: Evidence from Zircon U-Pb and Muscovite Ar-Ar Dating, Petrochemistry, and Wolframite Sr-Nd-Pb Isotopes

Cao

Yang

et al. 2018

Minerals

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Mesozoic multi‐stage W–Sn polymetallic mineralization in the Nanling Range, South China: An example from the Dengfuxian–Xitian ore field

Sun

Algeo

et al. 2018

Geological Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Dengfuxian and Xitian ore fields, located in the central Nanling Range of South China, are characterized by multi‐stage W–Sn polymetallic mineralization. In this study, whole‐rock and zircon compositions in altered granites from four typical deposits in these ore fields (i.e., Dalong Pb–Zn, Xiangdong W, Gaolong fluorite, and Shaiheling Sn–Pb–Zn) were studied to constrain their fluid chemistry and mineralization history. Compared to unaltered granites at Dengfuxian and Xitian, these fluid‐altered granites are characterized by more variable SiO2 (64.2–78.4%) and lower TiO2 (0.02–0.12%), CaO (0.25–1.2%), and Na2O (0.31–2.6%) concentrations, lower ΣREE (87–156 ppm), and higher Zr/Hf (11.1–31.6) and Y/Ho (31.1–53.4) ratios, suggesting intense F‐rich fluid metasomatism. Zircon cathodoluminescence (CL), transmitted light and back‐scattered electron (BSE) imaging, laser ablation multi‐collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA‐MC‐ICP‐MS) trace‐element analysis, U–Pb dating, and Hf isotopes revealed a sequence of three W–Sn polymetallic mineralization stages: a Triassic stage (~220 Ma), a Jurassic stage (~150 Ma), and a Cretaceous stage (~80 Ma). The Triassic episode was associated with a highly fractionated granitic magma derived from the lower crust and contaminated by basement rocks; the magmatic fluid was affected by a high 176Hf/177Hf component from the ~770‐Ma basement and probably precipitated under high F and high fO2 conditions. The Jurassic episode was related to mantle–crust interaction and resulted in large‐scale W–Sn mineralization at decreased fO2. The Cretaceous episode was marked by Sn mineralization in a lithospheric extensional setting. We infer that basement rocks were the major source of metals for the world‐class W–Sn ore deposits in the Nanling Range of South China. This study also demonstrates that whole‐rock geochemistry of hydrothermally altered granites in combination with Lu–Hf isotopic, U–Pb dating, and trace element analyses of magmatic and hydrothermal zircons can be a useful approach to recognition of multi‐stage magmatic and mineralization processes.

show abstract

Genesis and hydrothermal evolution of the Tiantangshan tin‐polymetallic deposit, south‐eastern Nanling Range, South China

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Tiantangshan tin‐polymetallic deposit, located in the Nanling Range of South China, is a medium‐sized polymetallic deposit found in the region in recent years. The deposit is hosted within volcanic rocks, and the orebodies occur in the cupola and outer contact zone of the concealed quartz porphyry, as well as the altered fracture zone of the volcanic rocks close to the intrusive contact. In light of field evidence and petrographic observations, the mineralization can be divided into four stages: greisenization stage (stage I), quartz–cassiterite–wolframite stage (stage II), quartz–fluorite–cassiterite–sulfides stage (stage III), and post‐ore stage (stage IV). Three types of fluid inclusions are present in the hydrothermal topaz, quartz, and fluorite, including H2O‐rich (W‐type, WL‐ and WV‐ subtypes), CO2‐bearing (C‐type), and solid‐bearing (S‐type). Four stages of fluid evolution are observed by detailed fluid inclusion studies: (a) Stage I fluids are trapped under two‐phase immiscible condition, as evidenced by the coexistence of primary aqueous (W‐type) and aqueous‐carbonic (C‐type) fluid inclusions preserved in topaz and quartz; the fluid inclusions display homogenization temperatures of 378–448°C and salinities of 6.0–17.5 wt.% NaCl equiv. (b) Similarly, fluid inclusions in stage II quartz also record immiscible condition, as identified by the coexistence of W‐type and C‐type fluid inclusions with lower homogenization temperatures (308–400°C) and salinities (1.8–14.5 wt.% NaCl equiv.). (c) Stage III fluids are characterized by the coexistence of widespread WL‐subtype, minor S‐type, and rare WV‐subtype fluid inclusions, with similar homogenization temperatures (230–369°C) but contrasting salinities (0.5–39.5 wt.% NaCl equiv.), which indicates an episode of fluid boiling occurred in this stage. (d) Stage IV marks the end of the hydrothermal system characterized by the lower temperatures (175–298°C) and salinities (0.2–3.9 wt.% NaCl equiv.) W‐type fluid inclusions trapped. Microthermometry and H–O isotopes indicate that the early ore‐forming fluids (in stage I) exsolved from the granitic magma and underwent progressive mixing with meteoric water during subsequent ore‐forming process (in stages III and IV). The water–CO2 fluid immiscibility is the main mechanism of cassiterite and wolframite precipitation, while fluid boiling and mixing are probably thought to be the dominant mechanisms for the deposition of sulfide at Tiantangshan. 40Ar/39Ar dating of hydrothermal biotite intergrown with cassiterite shows that tin‐polymetallic mineralization occurred at ~133 Ma which is coeval with the hidden intrusions. Taken together, these lines of evidence confirm that the Tiantangshan deposit is a magmatic hydrothermal greisen–quartz–vein type tin‐polymetallic deposit that formed in the lithospheric extension and thinning setting associated with the postsubduction Paleo‐Pacific Plate tectonic regime that influenced South China.

show abstract

Zircon U–Pb, molybdenite Re–Os and muscovite Ar–Ar isotopic dating of the Xitian W–Sn polymetallic deposit, eastern Hunan Province, South China and its geological significance

Cited by 51 publications

References 97 publications

Geochronology and Genesis of the Xitian W-Sn Polymetallic Deposit in Eastern Hunan Province, South China: Evidence from Zircon U-Pb and Muscovite Ar-Ar Dating, Petrochemistry, and Wolframite Sr-Nd-Pb Isotopes

Geochronology and Genesis of the Xitian W-Sn Polymetallic Deposit in Eastern Hunan Province, South China: Evidence from Zircon U-Pb and Muscovite Ar-Ar Dating, Petrochemistry, and Wolframite Sr-Nd-Pb Isotopes

Mesozoic multi‐stage W–Sn polymetallic mineralization in the Nanling Range, South China: An example from the Dengfuxian–Xitian ore field

Genesis and hydrothermal evolution of the Tiantangshan tin‐polymetallic deposit, south‐eastern Nanling Range, South China

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About