2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zircon SHRIMP U–Pb ages of the Gangdese Batholith and implications for Neotethyan subduction in southern Tibet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

11
335
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 445 publications
(348 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
11
335
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the Napuri adakitic magmas are contemporary with the Gangdese peak activities at ca. 50 Ma (e.g., Ji et al, 2009;Lee et al, 2009Lee et al, , 2012Wen et al, 2008a), their higher SiO 2 (66.4-73.9 wt.%) and lower MgO (0.4-1.0 wt.%) and compatible element (Cr = 2.9-7.4 ppm; 5 55 60 65 70 75 80 45 0 5 55 60 65 70 75 80 45 0 5 55 60 65 70 75 80 45 0 5 55 60 65 70 75 80 45 0 5 55 60 65 70 75 Ni = 1.6-4.5 ppm) contents also do not accord with a mantle origin (Martin et al, 2005). Their relatively enriched Sr-Nd isotopic compositions also argue against such a source (Fig.…”
Section: Adakitic (Groups I and Ii) Rocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Although the Napuri adakitic magmas are contemporary with the Gangdese peak activities at ca. 50 Ma (e.g., Ji et al, 2009;Lee et al, 2009Lee et al, , 2012Wen et al, 2008a), their higher SiO 2 (66.4-73.9 wt.%) and lower MgO (0.4-1.0 wt.%) and compatible element (Cr = 2.9-7.4 ppm; 5 55 60 65 70 75 80 45 0 5 55 60 65 70 75 80 45 0 5 55 60 65 70 75 80 45 0 5 55 60 65 70 75 80 45 0 5 55 60 65 70 75 Ni = 1.6-4.5 ppm) contents also do not accord with a mantle origin (Martin et al, 2005). Their relatively enriched Sr-Nd isotopic compositions also argue against such a source (Fig.…”
Section: Adakitic (Groups I and Ii) Rocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4d). In addition, the relatively low ε Nd (t) and ε Hf (t) isotopic values of the Napuri adakitic rocks compared to Gangdese Jurassic-Eocene granitoids (e.g., Ji et al, 2009Ji et al, , 2012Wen et al, 2008a) further rules out this possibility. The Group I samples are also characterized by positive Eu and Sr anomalies, which contradicts a model of partial melting of arc-type tonalites with amphibole and plagioclase as residual phases (Kamei et al, 2009).…”
Section: Adakitic (Groups I and Ii) Rocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations