2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.gr.2016.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zircon Hf signatures from granitic orthogneisses of the Spanish Central System: Significance and sources of the Cambro-Ordovician magmatism in the Iberian Variscan Belt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
1
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These data sit along an average crustal evolution trend together with those from the 550 Ma-old zircons, corresponding to Hf model ages comprised between 1.0 and 1.5 Ga, in agreement with Hf and Nd isotope data from the FMC granitoids Pin and Duthou, 1990;Turpin et al, 1990). Such model ages clearly have no geological significance as zircon in all Gondwana derived sediments throughout Europe provide no evidence for magmatism during this period (Balintoni et al, 2014;Díez Fernández et al, 2012;Drost et al, 2011;Gebauer et al, 1989;Gerdes and Zeh, 2006;Linnemann et al, 2014;Morag et al, 2011a;Pastor-Galán et al, 2013;Pereira et al, 2012a;2012b;Shaw et al, 2014;Sirevaag et al, 2016;Villaseca et al, 2016;Williams et al, 2012;Zeh and Gerdes, 2010). Instead, this Hf isotope signature would correspond again to a mixed source consisting of Neoproterozoic (0.6-0.8 Ga), juvenile crust and Archean/Paleoproterozoic crust (2.0-3.3 Ga).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…These data sit along an average crustal evolution trend together with those from the 550 Ma-old zircons, corresponding to Hf model ages comprised between 1.0 and 1.5 Ga, in agreement with Hf and Nd isotope data from the FMC granitoids Pin and Duthou, 1990;Turpin et al, 1990). Such model ages clearly have no geological significance as zircon in all Gondwana derived sediments throughout Europe provide no evidence for magmatism during this period (Balintoni et al, 2014;Díez Fernández et al, 2012;Drost et al, 2011;Gebauer et al, 1989;Gerdes and Zeh, 2006;Linnemann et al, 2014;Morag et al, 2011a;Pastor-Galán et al, 2013;Pereira et al, 2012a;2012b;Shaw et al, 2014;Sirevaag et al, 2016;Villaseca et al, 2016;Williams et al, 2012;Zeh and Gerdes, 2010). Instead, this Hf isotope signature would correspond again to a mixed source consisting of Neoproterozoic (0.6-0.8 Ga), juvenile crust and Archean/Paleoproterozoic crust (2.0-3.3 Ga).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Neoproterozoic to Cambrian age modes are likely derived from various terranes in North Africa and Arabia related to the East African Orogeny (600–500 Ma; e.g., Kröner & Stern, ). Cambro‐Ordovician to Silurian DZ ages are likely related to Peri‐Gondwanan terranes that are characterized by ubiquitous Ordovician magmatism, including the pre‐Variscan European basement and the Peri‐Gondwanan belt of the Middle East, associated with early Paleozoic subduction along the northern margin of Gondwana as well as rifting of Avalonia (e.g., Hassanzadeh et al, ; Villaseca et al, ; von Raumer et al, ). In the Attic‐Cycladic complex, clastic sediments from Samos island are dominated by Cambrian to Neoproterozoic sources (Löwen et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CC BY 4.0 License. 2015;Díaz-Alvarado el al., 2016;Villaseca et al, 2016;García-Arias et al, 2018). The peak of magmatic activity was reached at ca.…”
Section: The Phase Of Uplift and Denudation Of An Inherited Palaeorelmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although a general consensus exists to associate this Furongian-Ordovician magmatism with the opening of the Rheic Ocean and the drift of Avalonia from northwestern Gondwana (Díez Montes et al, 2010;Nance et al, 2010;Thomson et al, 2010;Álvaro et al, 2014a), the origin of this magmatism has received different interpretations. In the Central Iberian Zone, for instance, proposals point to: (i) magmas formed in a subduction scenario reaching the crust in a magmatic arc to back-arc setting (Valverde-Vaquero and Dunning, 2000;Castro et al, 2009); (ii) magmas resulting from partial melting of sediments or granitoids in a continental lower crust affected by the underplating of hot mafic magmas during an extensional regime (Bea et al, 2007;Montero et al, 2009;Díez Montes et al, 2010); and (iii) magmas formed by post-collisional decompression melting of an earlier thickened continental crust, and without significant mantellic involvement (Villaseca et al, 2016). In the Occitan Domain (southern French Massif Central and Mouthoumet massifs) and the eastern Pyrenees, Marini (1988), Pouclet et al (2017) and Puddu et al (2019) have suggested a link to mantle thermal anomalies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%