2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.01.356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zinc phthalocyanine — Influence of substrate temperature, film thickness, and kind of substrate on the morphology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
62
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
11
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 for the asdeposited ZnPc thin film have a small intense Bragg's reflection peak positioned at 2 = 6.76 o , which shows that small percentage of the ZnPc molecules stand with their long molecular axis nearly perpendicular to the substrate. 29,30 Comparing this experimental XRD patterns, with the one obtained by C. Schunemann et al 31 we can infer that in the ZnPc thin film the ZnPc layers are all ordered in monoclinic phase or a triclinic phase. The crystals molecular orientation is along 100 (triclinic phase) or 200 (monoclinic phase) planes which is considered to have the lowest surface energy.…”
Section: B Growth Mechanism Of the Asdeposited Znpc Lb Thin Filmsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…2 for the asdeposited ZnPc thin film have a small intense Bragg's reflection peak positioned at 2 = 6.76 o , which shows that small percentage of the ZnPc molecules stand with their long molecular axis nearly perpendicular to the substrate. 29,30 Comparing this experimental XRD patterns, with the one obtained by C. Schunemann et al 31 we can infer that in the ZnPc thin film the ZnPc layers are all ordered in monoclinic phase or a triclinic phase. The crystals molecular orientation is along 100 (triclinic phase) or 200 (monoclinic phase) planes which is considered to have the lowest surface energy.…”
Section: B Growth Mechanism Of the Asdeposited Znpc Lb Thin Filmsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…In this region, model-free Kramers-Kronig consistency was confirmed. The numerically obtained rms values are in very good agreement with those from our own nc-AFM images [7] and those presented in [18]. Without considering the surface roughness, the fit is less suitable which results in slightly different optical constants, especially in the ultraviolet spectral region.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…For this purpose, ηc is assumed to be independent of λ, as wavelength independent internal quantum efficiencies have been experimentally demonstrated for both polymer and small molecule systems. [2,17] We exclude thin ZnPc layers up to a threshold thickness of xt = 11nm from the fitting routine due to layer roughness [18] and DA inter-diffusion [8,19] (details in SI.6b). For thicker absorber layers, we model the charge extraction to be spatially uniform, as no significant concentration of recombination centers is present in the bulk of the neat absorber.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%