2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2006.10.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zinc–desferrioxamine reduces damage to lenses exposed to hyperbaric oxygen and has an ameliorative effect on catalase and Na, K-ATPase activities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While DFO proved only partially beneficial in salvaging the lens periphery from oxidative damage, Zn/DFO led to complete protective benefit to the lens anterior pole, the part most relevant for sight preservation [32,33]. These observations were in accord with other publications demonstrating the beneficial effects of iron chelating agents against oxidative insult-induced tissue damage [7,8,[34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While DFO proved only partially beneficial in salvaging the lens periphery from oxidative damage, Zn/DFO led to complete protective benefit to the lens anterior pole, the part most relevant for sight preservation [32,33]. These observations were in accord with other publications demonstrating the beneficial effects of iron chelating agents against oxidative insult-induced tissue damage [7,8,[34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The disadvantage of DFO in these studies stems from its limited tissue penetration [38,39]. Indeed, Zn/DFO easily infiltrates into cells and tissues [9,32,40] and is, thus, a better protective drug, as is evident also under conditions that simulate diabetes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be due to the higher CAT levels in the cortex+epithelium and the fact that the epithelium is the first site of oxygen reaction in the lens. 9,40 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Êàê óñòàíîâëåíî ê íàñòîÿùåìó âðåìåíè, îêèñëèòåëüíûé ñòðåññ èãðàåò ðîëü â ïàòîãåíåçå ìíîãèõ çàáîëåâàíèé, íàïðèìåð, äåãåíåðàòèâíûõ (âêëþ÷àÿ àòåðîñêëåðîç, áîêîâîé àìèîòðîôè÷åñêèé ñêëåðîç), ãåìîëèòè÷åñêîé àíåìèè, êàðäèîìèîïàòèè, àðòðèòîâ, äà è â ñàìîì ñòàðåíèè [8,25]. Îôòàëüìîëîãèÿ çäåñü íå èñêëþ÷åíèå -ñåíèëüíàÿ êàòàðàêòà, âîçðàñòíàÿ ìàêóëîäèñòðîôèÿ, ãåðïåòè÷åñêèé êåðàòèò, äèàáåòè÷åñêàÿ ðåòèíîïàòèÿ èëëþñòðèðóþò ýòî óòâåðaeäåíèå [19,31,49,50,51,61]. Íî îñîáî îòìå-òèì, ÷òî äëÿ ñåò÷àòêè, ÿâëÿþùåéñÿ ìåòàáîëè÷åñêè íàèáîëåå àêòèâíîé ñòðóêòóðîé â îðãàíèçìå ÷åëîâåêà [23], ýòîò ñòðåññ îñîáåííî îïàñåí.…”
Section: òàáëèöàunclassified
“…Ó÷èòûâàÿ âñå âûøåñêàçàííîå, íåóäèâèòåëüíî, ÷òî ó aeèâîòíûõ â íàøèõ îïûòàõ äàaeå íåêîòîðîå ñíèaeåíèå àêòèâíîñòè íåñêîëüêèõ ôåðìåíòîâ, îáåçâðåaeèâàþùèõ àêòèâíûå ôîðìû êèñëîðîäà, óaeå îêàçûâàåòñÿ âåñüìà îïàñíûì. Äîñòàòî÷íî íàïîìíèòü îá îáðàçîâàíèè âûñîêîòîêñè÷íîãî ãèäðîêñèëüíîãî ðàäèêàëà èç ïåðåêèñè âîäîðîäà â õîäå ðåàêöèè Ôåíòîíà [49,50], èíòåíñèâíîñòü ïðîòåêàíèÿ êîòîðîé óâåëè÷èâàåòñÿ õîòÿ áû áëàãîäàðÿ ñíèaeåíèþ àêòèâíîñòè ÃÏÎ è, â èçâåñòíîé ìåðå, êàòàëàçû, ÷òî è áûëî ïðîäåìîíñòðèðîâàíî íàìè âûøå.…”
Section: òàáëèöàunclassified