The sources of voltage loss in the minimal architecture zinc bromine battery are characterized using the galvanostatic intermittent titration technique (GITT) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) on a cell with a three electrode setup. Monitoring of the electrode voltages during charge/discharge indicate the full cell capacity is limited by the Zn/Zn 2+ negative electrode. From GITT, the losses in voltage due to mass transport are shown to be relatively small in comparison to the IR resistance in the cell. In addition, it is shown that decreases in the open circuit voltage with respect to theory are likely caused by the complexation of Br 2 into Br X − . Using EIS, the charge transfer resistances at each electrode and ohmic resistances of each component are determined. Overall, the main factors restricting the voltage of the cell are the ohmic resistances in the carbon cloth current collectors and in the electrolyte. Additionally, significant charge transfer resistances are observed at the negative electrode near the start of charge and end of discharge, when the amount of zinc plated on the carbon cloth electrode is minimal. The major design criteria for electrochemical energy storage on the grid-scale are low cost and long lifetime. To accomplish this, research efforts have largely focused on the development of lowcost active materials which are incorporated into traditional battery designs.1-10 These designs typically contain a considerable amount of passive components that are necessary for extending the lifetime of the battery. An undesired consequence of combining inexpensive materials with passive components is the balance-of-plant cost far outweighs the active material cost.For example, zinc-bromine redox flow batteries have been shown to perform with less than 20% capacity fade for 2,500 cycles. 11,12 However, the cost of this technology (>$200 kWh) is still prohibitive even though the active materials and carbon electrodes only account for ∼$8 kWh. 13 The majority of the cost comes from the system level, where complexing agents, separation membranes, and flow systems are used to prevent the corrosive bromine from reacting with the zinc electrode. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] In light of this fact, our lab has recently developed a minimal architecture zinc-bromine battery (MA-ZBB), which utilizes the same chemistry from commercial zinc-bromine flow batteries, but does not require the need of any passive components, significantly reducing the cost (projected ∼$94/kWh).24 The MA-ZBB is composed of two carbon based electrodes, which are spatially separated in the vertical direction, in an aqueous electrolyte containing zinc-bromide salt. The battery does not contain any passive components for controlling bromine/zinc interaction (i.e. pumps, membranes or complexing agents). Instead, the electrodes are vertically separated to utilize the variations in density between bromine and the aqueous electrolyte as an advantage to minimize self-discharge. At the negative electrode on top of th...