1990
DOI: 10.1109/20.104494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zig-zag transition region of bit written by various heads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1991
1991
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the three films studied here the predicted variations of transition widths with packing density according to (8) are shown in figure 7. For comparison purposes the transition widths calculated according to the selfdemagnetization limit, even taking into account the effects of interbit interactions, are considerably smaller than for the write loss limited case and so the recording process in these films was write loss limited as confirmed elsewhere [10]. The fact that predicted transition widths are smaller than observations could be due to the use of non-optimum write currents during recording, imperfect knowledge of hysteresis properties of the media and conditions during the write process.…”
Section: Theoretical Considerations and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…For the three films studied here the predicted variations of transition widths with packing density according to (8) are shown in figure 7. For comparison purposes the transition widths calculated according to the selfdemagnetization limit, even taking into account the effects of interbit interactions, are considerably smaller than for the write loss limited case and so the recording process in these films was write loss limited as confirmed elsewhere [10]. The fact that predicted transition widths are smaller than observations could be due to the use of non-optimum write currents during recording, imperfect knowledge of hysteresis properties of the media and conditions during the write process.…”
Section: Theoretical Considerations and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Therefore, if the transition is not deformed by the influence of the secondary field, the transition lengths on various coercivities is determined by the field gradient of the primary field at the writing edge at which the field strength is equal to the coercivity. [2][3] In conclusion, the transition-length is determined by the relationship of (field gradient )-112, when the field is just over the coercivity. If the field strength equals the media coercivity, the transition is determined by the field gradient of zero.…”
Section: Core Saturationmentioning
confidence: 93%