2002
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.2002.8250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zeta Potentials and Yield Stresses of Silica Suspensions in Concentrated Monovalent Electrolytes: Isoelectric Point Shift and Additional Attraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

33
229
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 269 publications
(263 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
33
229
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Turbidity at k = 400 nm of CNC suspension for different CNC concentrations as a function of (a, left) salt concentration and of (b, right) ionic strength for divalent salts and monovalent salts, as indicated in the figure 2010; Vlachy et al 2009). Similar effects have been observed for other colloids such as bubbles (Craig et al 1993), silica nanoparticles (Franks 2002) as well as globular proteins (Boström et al 2003). Our results show a direct correspondence to the Hofmeister series where the surface affinity increases according to Li…”
Section: Ion Specific Effects For Monovalent Ionssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…2 Turbidity at k = 400 nm of CNC suspension for different CNC concentrations as a function of (a, left) salt concentration and of (b, right) ionic strength for divalent salts and monovalent salts, as indicated in the figure 2010; Vlachy et al 2009). Similar effects have been observed for other colloids such as bubbles (Craig et al 1993), silica nanoparticles (Franks 2002) as well as globular proteins (Boström et al 2003). Our results show a direct correspondence to the Hofmeister series where the surface affinity increases according to Li…”
Section: Ion Specific Effects For Monovalent Ionssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…3), it may be suggested that it is the larger charge of the larger particles that competes with the effect of steric hindrance. The higher particle charge may have two possible effects on the system, one being the adsorption of a higher load of potassium ions at the particle surface, as noted before [21], which would leave less cations free to act as electrostatic stabilizers in the junction gels and, thus, resulting in a weaker gel. A second possible effect relates to the higher repulsion between larger particles which would impede their physical approximation even at higher loads.…”
Section: Gelationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The yield stress can be considered to be proportional to the inverse square of particle 224 separation (van der Waals forces) minus the square of the interaction potential (zeta potential) ( fly ash has been shown to be negative, with those in NaOH solutions showing a larger negative potential 234 (Nägele and Schneider 1989). This behavior is attributed to the enhanced adsorption of K + on the fly ash 235 particle surfaces than Na + ions (Franks 2002), resulting in a less negative surface charge as the K + 236 concentration is increased. As the zeta potential decreases (i.e., becomes less negative), the yield stress 237 increases due to a decreased repulsive force between fly ash particles.…”
Section: Rheological Behavior Of Fly Ash Suspensions Activated With Nmentioning
confidence: 99%