2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.minpro.2008.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zeta potential of air bubbles in presence of frothers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
30
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Normally, 0 z is a reference point in the charge-free vapor region, ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 If we chose a 0 z value of 2.5 nm for pure water system at 300 K, as shown in Figure 2, we obtain a surface potential difference value, φ ∆ , of -600 ± 10 mV which is close to the simulation values reported by other groups 32,43,45 but is significantly larger than the surface potential values reported from air-bubble experiments in the range from -40mV to -65mV 27,46,47 . However, there is another electrical field zero point at z = 3.2 nm as the consequence of the reversal of electrical field in which corresponds to the minimum value of the potentials.…”
Section: Calculation Of Interfacial Potentialmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Normally, 0 z is a reference point in the charge-free vapor region, ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 If we chose a 0 z value of 2.5 nm for pure water system at 300 K, as shown in Figure 2, we obtain a surface potential difference value, φ ∆ , of -600 ± 10 mV which is close to the simulation values reported by other groups 32,43,45 but is significantly larger than the surface potential values reported from air-bubble experiments in the range from -40mV to -65mV 27,46,47 . However, there is another electrical field zero point at z = 3.2 nm as the consequence of the reversal of electrical field in which corresponds to the minimum value of the potentials.…”
Section: Calculation Of Interfacial Potentialmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The zeta potential of bubbles is known to be negative in circumneutral environments. 33,34) Hence, for consistency with the oatability trend, the zeta potential of the mineral must negatively increase with increasing H 2 O 2 molar ratio. In the present study, however, the H 2 O 2 treatment positively accelerated the zeta potentials of both PbS and CuFeS 2 at both initial pH levels.…”
Section: Causes Of Reduced Oatability In the Presence Of H 2 Omentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Using Derjaguin approximation, the total double-layer energy, E T e , between the hemisphericalasperity-coated silica sphere and air bubble surface becomes [26]: [29][30][31][32][33]. It should be noted that Equation (4) works best when the closest distance (i.e., h − r) is greater than several Debye lengths due to the linear approximation treatment [26].…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%