2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2008.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zeta potential measurement as a diagnostic tool in enzyme immobilisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
31
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…When the potential is low, attraction exceeds repulsion and the particles tend to aggregate. So, particles with high zeta potential (negative or positive) are electrically stabilized while particles with low zeta potentials tend to coagulate or flocculate as outlined in Table 1 [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the potential is low, attraction exceeds repulsion and the particles tend to aggregate. So, particles with high zeta potential (negative or positive) are electrically stabilized while particles with low zeta potentials tend to coagulate or flocculate as outlined in Table 1 [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as well as the type of method or buffer used (Michen and Graule 2010) and the temperature of determination. For example, Schultz et al (2008) measured IEPs of 4 and 7.5 for Candida antarctica A-type lipase using, respectively, electrophoretic mobility and isoelectric focusing techniques. Righetti and Caravaggio reported in 1976 that the IEP of a protein might differ by up to 0.5 pH unit when determined at 25 and 4°C, the value increasing as the temperature decreases.…”
Section: Isoelectric Point and Zeta Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies demonstrated that these techniques were suitable for protein characterization [26,27]. In order to analyse the particle size in pectinase solution in the conditions in which membrane was fouled with pectinase (at 25 °C) and during cleaning treatment (at 50 °C in presence of NaCl), different analysis were carried out by DLS varying protein concentration (2, 7, 15 g/L).…”
Section: Characterization Of the Enzymatic Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%