2002
DOI: 10.1006/jfan.2001.3893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zeta Determinants on Manifolds with Boundary

Abstract: Through a general theory for relative spectral invariants, we study the zdeterminant of global boundary problems of APS-type. In particular, we compute the z-determinant ratio for Dirac-Laplacian boundary problems in terms of a scattering Fredholm determinant over the boundary. # 2002 Elsevier Science (USA)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note 34 One may break the product in (18) into sporadic terms together with terms associated with z n which are close to one of the straight lines already described. The products associated with each line are asymptotically similar to certain formulae involving gamma functions, namely e (γ+δ)z Γ (a + 1)…”
Section: Inverse Spectral Theorymentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Note 34 One may break the product in (18) into sporadic terms together with terms associated with z n which are close to one of the straight lines already described. The products associated with each line are asymptotically similar to certain formulae involving gamma functions, namely e (γ+δ)z Γ (a + 1)…”
Section: Inverse Spectral Theorymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The statement of the theorem is a consequence of the fact that F (z) is an entire function of order 1, and can therefore be written in the form F (z) = z m e hz ∞ n=1 1 − z z n e z/zn (18) for some h ∈ C, where z n are the zeros of F (z). See [12, p. 199].…”
Section: Inverse Spectral Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For generalized APS spectral projectors, the comparison problem for the eta invariant was first solved modulo Z by Lesch and Wojciechowski [20] and Müller [31]; later, this integer ambiguity was removed by the first author [21]. For P − ∈ Gr * ∞ (D − ) and assuming the invertibility of D P− , the comparison problems for the eta invariant and the ζ-determinant were solved by Scott and Wojciechowski [38] and Scott [37]; cf. Forman [10].…”
Section: The Comparison or Relative Invariant Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case that ker Ᏸ T = ker Ᏸ −σ = 0, the second formula in Theorem 1.2 can be derived from [Scott 2002;Scott and Wojciechowski 2000]. We emphasize that the term (det ᏸ −σ ) 2 /(det ᏸ T ) 2 in this formula is new, and this factor is nontrivial in general.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%