The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1998
DOI: 10.1007/s002200050304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zero Viscosity Limit for Analytic Solutions, of the Navier-Stokes Equation on a Half-Space.¶I. Existence for Euler and Prandtl Equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

8
312
0
7

Year Published

1999
1999
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 383 publications
(327 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
8
312
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact we show that the time of existence of a regular solution does not depend on the boundary layer solution whereas in [4] and [5] the size of the domain of analyticity was shrinking at each step of the asymptotic expansion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In fact we show that the time of existence of a regular solution does not depend on the boundary layer solution whereas in [4] and [5] the size of the domain of analyticity was shrinking at each step of the asymptotic expansion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Our analysis will strictly follow Sammartino and Caflish ( [4] and [5]). In their papers the authors proved that the solution of the Navier-Stokes equations with analytic initial data can be decomposed in the form of an asymptotic series.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The stationary Prandtl system has been widely studied [12]. Despite its importance in engeneering applications [7], [15], very few results are known for the existence of (global in time) solutions of the instationary system [12,13,14]. In both cases, the stationary and the instationary one, a possible way to tackle the problem consists in using the so-called Crocco transformation [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(due to the compatibility conditions), and on the usual estimates on the heat operators given, e.g., in [3,6]. Notice the loss of regularity (one derivative) in the radial component due to the incompressibility condition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%