1976
DOI: 10.1007/bf00640013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zero velocity surfaces for the general planar three-body problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The topology of these surfaces and hence the regions of possible motion are controlled in this case by the Jacobi constant. For full three-body systems, where all the masses have finite values, the theory of Hill stability was developed using different approaches by Gobulev (1967Gobulev ( , 1968, Marchal and Saari (1975), Zare (1976Zare ( , 1977, and Bozis (1976). For this full three-body case the important parameter is c 2 E, where E is the energy and c the angular momentum of the system of three masses.…”
Section: Full Three Body Hill Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The topology of these surfaces and hence the regions of possible motion are controlled in this case by the Jacobi constant. For full three-body systems, where all the masses have finite values, the theory of Hill stability was developed using different approaches by Gobulev (1967Gobulev ( , 1968, Marchal and Saari (1975), Zare (1976Zare ( , 1977, and Bozis (1976). For this full three-body case the important parameter is c 2 E, where E is the energy and c the angular momentum of the system of three masses.…”
Section: Full Three Body Hill Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theory of Hill stability has been developed for full threebody systems by Gobulev (1967Gobulev ( , 1968, and Marchal and Saari (1975) using Sundman's inequality; Zare (1976Zare ( , 1977 using Hamiltonian dynamics and reduction; Bozis (1976) using algebraic manipulation of integrals. These methods extended the concept of zero velocity surfaces, introduced by Hill (1878) and used extensively in the restricted three-body problem, to the problem of general three-body motions.…”
Section: Hill Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For some values of the energy and of the angular momentum integrals, the seventies, with the integrals in the 3-body the level manifolds of the 10 classical integrals are topologically disconnected as subsets of the phase space; moreover, the projections of these disconnected components on the configuration space are also disconnected, hence forbidden configurations do form a boundary that separates regions of'trapped' motions (Golubev, 1968;Smale, 1970a;Marchal, 1971;Smale, 1970b;Easton, Marchal and Saari, 1975;Zare, 1976Zare, , 1977Bozis, Although the relevance of this result for the systems was perceived (see e.g. 1977;Roy, 1979;Walker et al, 1980;Walker and Roy, 1981) there have been some problems in fully exploiting this discovery in assessing the 'stability' of such systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%