Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1970
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-1970-0266293-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zero-one laws for Gaussian processes

Abstract: Abstract. Some zero-one laws are proved for Gaussian processes defined on linear spaces of functions. They are generalizations of a result for Wiener measure due to R. H. Cameron and R. E. Graves. The proofs exploit an interesting relationship between a Gaussian process and its reproducing kernel Hubert space. Applications are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Introduction. For the background and history of the problem we refer to [l]and [2]. We would like to point out here that Jamison and Orey in [l] proved the above result for the special case where the Gaussian process involved had continuous paths.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Introduction. For the background and history of the problem we refer to [l]and [2]. We would like to point out here that Jamison and Orey in [l] proved the above result for the special case where the Gaussian process involved had continuous paths.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…We would like to point out here that Jamison and Orey in [l] proved the above result for the special case where the Gaussian process involved had continuous paths. Kallianpur [2] proved such a result for r-modules (groups closed under multiplication by rationals). Kallianpur's result for groups is restricted to those which are 73(X)-measurable rather than B0(X)-measurable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The following lemma is given in [5] as Lemma 6. Although this lemma is stated there only for a real-valued function g, the same proof works for extended real-valued functions as well.…”
Section: N)mentioning
confidence: 99%