2007
DOI: 10.4064/aa127-3-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zero-density estimate of L-functions attached to Maass forms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This assumption has been proved for a wide range of L-functions. Indeed it holds for all elements of the Selberg Class S by the work of Kaczorowski and Perelli [11], and for L-functions attached to GL(2)-Maass cusp forms by the work of Sankaranarayanan and Sengupta [25]. We prove Theorem 3.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This assumption has been proved for a wide range of L-functions. Indeed it holds for all elements of the Selberg Class S by the work of Kaczorowski and Perelli [11], and for L-functions attached to GL(2)-Maass cusp forms by the work of Sankaranarayanan and Sengupta [25]. We prove Theorem 3.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The key ingredients to prove the above lemma are followed from [13, p. 102, Fomula 5.24] and [18,Lemma 3.6]. One can therefore apply the similar argument as in [20, p. 219, Section 9.8] or [9, p. 6] to complete the proof.…”
Section: Transformation Formula Involving the Non-trivial Zeros Of L(...mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Here we take the Riemann zeta function ζ(s) as an example of the automorphic Lfunction L(s, π). To specify π by cusp forms and Maass forms, we refer to the references [16][17][18] and references therein. From the works of Ingham [19] and Huxley [20] we know that…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%