Zementierte Hüftendoprothetik in Deutschland - ein Update

Kreutzer, J; Schneider, Matheus B.; Schlegel, Ulf J.; Ewerbeck, Volker; Breusch, S. J.

doi:10.1055/s-2004-832406

Cited by 13 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Varying properties of bone cements can lead to different levels of penetration into the tibia apophysis. In vitro studies demonstrated a significant influence of penetration on the initial component stability in TKA [11,22,23]. Limited experimental and clinical data exist for the material properties of the Refobacin ® Bone Cement R. Kock et al [6] compared the chemical composition, handling properties, and ISO standard mechanical testing of four different bone cements in vitro.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Revision of tibial TKA components: bone loss is independent of cementing type and technique: an in vitro cadaver study

Efe

Figiel²,

Sibbert³

et al. 2011

BMC Musculoskelet Disord

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundDifferent bone cements and various cementation techniques can lead to different bone loss in revision surgery. We investigated the degree of tibial bone loss depending on different cements and techniques.Methods30 tibia specimens were matched into three groups (10 each). In all cases Genesis II tibia component were implanted. In two groups, the tibia base plate alone was cemented with Palacos® R+G and Refobacin® Bone Cement R. In the third group, both tibial base plate and tibial stem were cemented with Palacos® R+G. Afterwards, the specimens were axial loaded with 2000 N for 10,000 cycles. Tibial components were explanted and the required time to explantation was recorded. Bone loss after explantation was measured by CT.ResultsOn CT, there was no significant difference in bone loss between cementing techniques (p = 0.077; 95% CI -1.14 - 21.03) or the cements themselves (p = 0.345; 95% CI -6.05 - 16.70). The required time to explantation was 170.6 ± 54.89, 228.7 ± 84.5, and 145.7 ± 73.0 seconds in the first, second, and third groups, respectively.ConclusionsCement technique and type do not influence tibial bone loss in simulated revision surgery of the tibial component in knee arthroplasty.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Revision of tibial TKA components: bone loss is independent of cementing type and technique: an in vitro cadaver study

Efe

Figiel²,

Sibbert³

et al. 2011

BMC Musculoskelet Disord

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Durch die immer weiter fortschreitende Entwicklung in der Hüftgelenken-doprothetik nimmt diese Behandlungsform bei jährlich etwa 500.000 implantierten Hüftendoprothesen in Europa eine zentrale Rolle in der unfallchirurgischen und orthopädischen Tätigkeit ein [68,77]. In Deutschland werden jährlich etwa 200.000 Hüftendoprothesenoperationen mit einer Vielzahl von Prothesenmodellen durchgeführt [55], von denen etwa 10% zementiert werden [50]. Die Zahl der Wechseloperationen in Deutschland liegt derzeit zwischen 5 und 10% [55].…”

Section: Wann Wird Zementiert? Hüftendoprothetikunclassified

When should joint prostheses be cemented?

Özkır¹,

Droste²,

Echtermeyer³

2007

Trauma Berufskrankh

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Die Erkenntnisse führten über die Jahre hinweg zu einer sukzessiven Verbesserung der Techniken mit Erweiterungen in verschiedenen Generationen der Zementiertechnik (l " Abb. 1)[28]. Diese Weiterentwicklungen spiegeln sich auch in neueren Untersuchungen des Schwedenregisters wider[4].…”

unclassified

Zementiertechnik in der Endoprothetik des Hüftgelenks: eine Übersicht

Fottner¹,

Utzschneider²,

Mazoochian³

et al. 2010

Z Orthop Unfall

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

For decades the cemented anchorage of hip prostheses, especially for elderly patients, is the standard procedure. The cementing technique has turned out to be the determining factor for the survival of the implant. In the last few years developments in this field have been able to further improve the long-term survival. Established components of the modern cementing technique are vacuum-mixed cements, medullary canal plugs, centralising elements und the use of jet-lavages. The design of the cemented shaft depends on the more important surface finish. In the most clinical studies, polished shafts turned out to be slightly superior as compared to shafts with rough surfaces.

show abstract

Zementierte Hüftendoprothetik in Deutschland - ein Update

Cited by 13 publications

References 28 publications

Revision of tibial TKA components: bone loss is independent of cementing type and technique: an in vitro cadaver study

Revision of tibial TKA components: bone loss is independent of cementing type and technique: an in vitro cadaver study

When should joint prostheses be cemented?

Zementiertechnik in der Endoprothetik des Hüftgelenks: eine Übersicht

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About