2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-00106-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ZEB1 regulates glioma stemness through LIF repression

Abstract: The identification of a stem cell regulatory gene which is aberrantly expressed in glioma and associated with patient survival would increase the understanding of the role of glioma cancer stem cells (GCSCs) in the virulence of gliomas. Interrogating the genomes of over 4000 brain cancers we identified ZEB1 deletion in ~15% (grade II and III) and 50% of glioblastomas. Meta-analysis of ZEB1 copy number status in 2,988 cases of glioma revealed disruptive ZEB1 deletions associated with decreased survival. We iden… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(52 reference statements)
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we inferred that it was more likely a regulation rather than selection. The stemness induced by EMT was reported to be regulated in conventional cell lines by various genes, such as ZEB1, Twist1, Slug, Snail, and Vimentin [5,74,85]. We saw a similar pattern where the EMT was regulated by different factors in the individual lines, but we observed a temporarily upregulated self-renewal capacity under chemotherapeutic stress in primary BCSCs (Figure 5).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Therefore, we inferred that it was more likely a regulation rather than selection. The stemness induced by EMT was reported to be regulated in conventional cell lines by various genes, such as ZEB1, Twist1, Slug, Snail, and Vimentin [5,74,85]. We saw a similar pattern where the EMT was regulated by different factors in the individual lines, but we observed a temporarily upregulated self-renewal capacity under chemotherapeutic stress in primary BCSCs (Figure 5).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Additional IDH1 wt super-enhancers marked by 5hmC in our dataset and implicated in GBM pathogenesis included WDR1 , TGFBI and PVT1 [ 11 , 36 , 43 , 74 ]. IDH1 mt-specific super-enhancer targets marked by 5hmC in our cohort and previously implicated in GBM pathogenesis included PDGFC , PRRX1 , LIF , A XL , and CD44 [ 14 , 18 , 31 , 50 , 55 , 63 , 71 ]. Taken together, these data demonstrated enhancer/super-enhancer targeting by 5hmC as a prominent feature in HGG, with differential targeting observed between IDH1 cohorts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…7b-f), reflecting less differentiated, more proliferative stem cells with greater resistance to hypoxia (18). To investigate potential mediators of the increased stem-cell like behavior and mesenchymal change identified in U87-Bev R xenografts and BRGs, qPCR was performed on explanted U87-Bev R and U87-Bev S tumors for GLUT3 and ZEB1, genes associated with both properties (19,20), revealing increased GLUT3 and ZEB1 gene expression in U87-Bev R xenografts (P=1X10 -5 -0.02; Fig. 7g).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%