Zbornik radova “Intelektualac, kultura, reforma: Ivan Mažuranić i njegovo vrijeme”, ur. Dalibor Čepulo, Tea Rogić Musa i Drago Roksandić, Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu i Leksikografski zavod Miroslav Krleža, Zagreb, 2014. – 2019.

Lachner, Višnja

doi:10.3935/zpfz.69.56.12

ZPFZ

2019

DOI: 10.3935/zpfz.69.56.12

|View full text |Cite

Zbornik radova “Intelektualac, kultura, reforma: Ivan Mažuranić i njegovo vrijeme”, ur. Dalibor Čepulo, Tea Rogić Musa i Drago Roksandić, Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu i Leksikografski zavod Miroslav Krleža, Zagreb, 2014. – 2019.

Višnja Lachner

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2020

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Az 1868-as nemzetiségi törvény és a magyar–horvát kiegyezés

Andrási

2020

ERJOG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Act XXX of 1868 regulated the public law situation of Croats and Hungarians in a uniquely subdualist way within the Monarchy, and the status quo provided an appropriate basis and guarantees for further development. Another significant step in the settlement of ethnic relations within the Monarchy was Act XLIV of 1868, a law that had an organic relationship with the Compromise Act. Both the Compromise Act and the Nationality Act were defined by the public law conception represented by Ferenc Deák, the essence of which is to focus on the terminology of the unified “political nation” for the Hungarian side, and the position and rights of other national minorities were regulated in relation to it. In Deák’s understanding, the concept of the political nation was linked to the idea of the nation-state, which, as a result of domestic political changes after 1875, became increasingly nationalist and upset relations with individual nationalities, including Croats. In the long run, this process led to mutual misunderstandings between the peoples within the Habsburg Monarchy and to an explosion of ethnic and political relations as a result of several unfortunate political factors.

show abstract

Az 1868-as nemzetiségi törvény és a magyar–horvát kiegyezés

Andrási

2020

ERJOG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Zbornik radova “Intelektualac, kultura, reforma: Ivan Mažuranić i njegovo vrijeme”, ur. Dalibor Čepulo, Tea Rogić Musa i Drago Roksandić, Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu i Leksikografski zavod Miroslav Krleža, Zagreb, 2014. – 2019.

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Az 1868-as nemzetiségi törvény és a magyar–horvát kiegyezés

Az 1868-as nemzetiségi törvény és a magyar–horvát kiegyezés

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About