Zarit Burden Interview

Zarit, Steven H.; Reever, Karen E.; Bach-Peterson, Julie

doi:10.1037/t06571-000

Cited by 82 publications

(113 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

106

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) is designed to capture the impact of a caring role on the carer's personal and social well-being 33. It consists of 22 items (total score 0–88).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A longitudinal, multicentre, cohort study of community rehabilitation service delivery in long-term neurological conditions

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesPart A: To pilot the use of a register to identify and monitor patients with complex needs arising from long-term neurological conditions. Part B: To determine the extent to which patients’ needs for health and social services are met following discharge to the community after inpatient rehabilitation; to identify which factors predict unmet needs and to explore the relationship between service provision and outcomes at 12 months.DesignA multicentre, prospective, cohort study surveying participants at 1, 6 and 12 months using postal/online questionnaires and telephone interview.SettingConsecutive discharges to the community from all nine tertiary, specialist, inpatient neurorehabilitation services in London over 18 months in 2010–2011.ParticipantsOf 576 admissions 428 patients were recruited at discharge: 256 responded at 4 weeks, 212 at 6 months and 190 at 12 months.MeasuresNeurological Impairment Scale, The Needs and Provision Complexity Scale, The Northwick Park Dependency Scale, Community Integration Questionnaire, Zarit Burden Inventory.Resultsn=322 (75%) expressed willingness to be registered, but in practice less than half responded to questionnaires at 6 and 12 months (49% and 44%, respectively), despite extensive efforts to contact them, with no significant differences between responders and non-responders. Significant unmet needs were identified within the first year following discharge, particularly in rehabilitation, social work support and provision of specialist equipment. Dependency for basic care and motor and cognitive impairment predicted services received, together accounting for 40% of the variance. Contra to expectation, patients whose rehabilitation needs were met were more dependent and less well integrated at 12 months post discharge than those with unmet needs.ConclusionsRegistration is acceptable to most patients, but questionnaires/telephone interviews may not be the most efficient way to reach them. When community resources are limited, service provision tends to be focused on the most dependent patients.RegistrationThe study was registered with the NIHR Comprehensive Local Research Network: ID number 7503

show abstract

“…The Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) is designed to capture the impact of a caring role on the carer's personal and social well-being 33. It consists of 22 items (total score 0–88).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A longitudinal, multicentre, cohort study of community rehabilitation service delivery in long-term neurological conditions

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…f/u = Follow-up. IG = Intervention group. * Study-specific measure. ** Effect sizes computed as group differences in Cohen’s d for published posttest-pretest changes. Measures: ADLS (Activity of Daily Living Scale; Lawton and Brody 1969); CB (Caregiver Burden; Zarit 1990); CDAD (Chinese Disability Assessment for Dementia; Mok et al 2005); CDR (Clinical Dementia Rating; Morris 1997); CES-D (Centers for Epidemiological Studies -Depression; Radloff 1977); CFQ (Cognitive Failures Questionnaire; Broadbent et al 1982); CSDD (Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia; C. Lam et al 2004); DAFS-R (Direct Assessment of Functional Status; Loewenstein and Bates 1989); DASS-21 (Depression Anxiety Stress Scale; Lovibond and Lovibond 1995); E-Cog (Everyday Cognition Memory Subtest; Farias et al 2008); GDS-SF (Geriatric Depression Scale-Short form; Sheikh et al 1986); LAQ (Leisure Activity Questionnaire; Verghese et al 2003); MADRS (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale; Montgomery and Asberg 1979); MIC (Memory Inventory for Chinese; Cheong et al 2006); MFQ (Memory Functioning Questionnaire; Gilewski et al 1990); MMQ (Multifactorial Metamemory Questionnaire;Troyer and Rich 2002); NPI (Neuropsychiatric Inventory; Cummings et al 1994); QAM (Questionnaire d’auto-evaluation de la memoire; Van der Linden et al 1989); PAQ (Physical Activity Questionnaire; Jamrozik et al 2000); PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire-Nine Item; Kroenke et al 2001); QOL-AD (Quality of Life-Alzheimer’s Disease; Logsdon et al 2002); QOLQ (Quality of Life Questionnaire; Machnicki et al 2009); RBMT (Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test; Wilson et al 1989); REACH (Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer’s Caregiver’s Health; Wisniewski et al 2003); SAILS (Structured Assessment of Independent Living Skills; Mahurin et al 1991); SNSQ (Social Network Satisfaction Questionnaire; Koenig et al 1993). …”

Section: Figmentioning

confidence: 99%

Everyday Impact of Cognitive Interventions in Mild Cognitive Impairment: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cognitive interventions in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) seek to ameliorate cognitive symptoms in the condition. Cognitive interventions may or may not generalize beyond cognitive outcomes to everyday life. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to assess the effect of cognitive interventions compared to a control group in MCI on generalizability outcome measures [activities of daily living (ADLs), mood, quality of life (QOL), and metacognition] rather than cognitive outcomes alone. PRISMA guidelines were followed. MEDLINE and PsychInfo were utilized as data sources to locate references related to cognitive interventions in individuals with MCI. The cognitive intervention study was required to have a control or alternative treatment comparison group to be included. Thirty articles met criteria, including six computerized cognitive interventions, 14 therapist-based interventions, and 10 multimodal (i.e., cognitive intervention plus an additional intervention) studies. Small, but significant overall median effects were seen for ADLs (d = 0.23), mood (d = 0.16), and metacognitive outcomes (d = 0.30), but not for QOL (d = 0.10). Computerized studies appeared to benefit mood (depression, anxiety, and apathy) compared to controls, while therapist-based interventions and multimodal interventions had more impact on ADLs and metacognitive outcomes than control conditions. The results are encouraging that cognitive interventions in MCI may impact everyday life, but considerably more research is needed. The current review and meta-analysis is limited by our use of only PsychInfo and MEDLINE databases, our inability to read full text non-English articles, and our reliance on only published data to complete effect sizes.

show abstract

“…Cronbach's a ¼ 0.93 was found for the current sample. The Korean version-Burden Interview (BI; Lee et al, 2004;Zarit et al, 1980;Zarit and Zarit, 1987). A 22-item BI was used to assess subjective stressors.…”

Section: Objective Stressorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Stress in caregivers of demented people in Korea—a modification of Pearlin and colleagues' stress model

Lee¹,

Kim²,

Kim³

2006

Int J Geriat Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Zarit Burden Interview

Cited by 82 publications

References 0 publications

A longitudinal, multicentre, cohort study of community rehabilitation service delivery in long-term neurological conditions

A longitudinal, multicentre, cohort study of community rehabilitation service delivery in long-term neurological conditions

Everyday Impact of Cognitive Interventions in Mild Cognitive Impairment: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Stress in caregivers of demented people in Korea—a modification of Pearlin and colleagues' stress model

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About