2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.10.18.464805
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zapline-plus: a Zapline extension for automatic and adaptive removal of frequency-specific noise artifacts in M/EEG

Abstract: Removing power line and other frequency-specific artifacts from electrophysiological data without affecting neural signals remains a challenging task. Recently, an approach was introduced that combines spectral and spatial filtering to effectively remove line noise: Zapline (de Cheveigné, 2020). This algorithm, however, requires manual selection of the noise frequency and the number of spatial components to remove during spatial filtering. Moreover, it assumes that noise frequency and spatial topography are st… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(73 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Auditory Gait data set had a notch filter applied before uploading. All other data sets were processed with Zapline-plus (de Cheveigné, 2020; Klug & Kloosterman, 2022) to remove line noise and other frequency-specific noise peaks. Zapline (de Cheveigné, 2020) removes noise by splitting the data into an originally clean (data A) and a noisy part (data B) by filtering the data once with a notch filter (A) and once with the inverse of this notch filter (B).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Auditory Gait data set had a notch filter applied before uploading. All other data sets were processed with Zapline-plus (de Cheveigné, 2020; Klug & Kloosterman, 2022) to remove line noise and other frequency-specific noise peaks. Zapline (de Cheveigné, 2020) removes noise by splitting the data into an originally clean (data A) and a noisy part (data B) by filtering the data once with a notch filter (A) and once with the inverse of this notch filter (B).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artifact subspace reconstruction ( 53 ), was calibrated with a standing baseline at the beginning of the recordings and used to correct artifacts with a cut-off of SD = 20, following the version's default settings and recommendations ( 54 ). Then line noise was corrected with the zapline plus tool ( 55 ) (available at https://github.com/MariusKlug/zapline-plus , retrieved 26.10.21, with noise frequency 50 Hz, highest Frequency 61 Hz) an extension to zapline ( 56 ). After spherical interpolation of the previously rejected channels, channels were re-referenced to the full rank common average (version 0.10, available at http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/plugins/fullRankAveRef0.10.zip ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, parameters can be adjusted if the cleaning does not work as intended. See (Klug & Kloosterman, 2022) for details about the processing and parameter tweaking. This step can be avoided by setting the whole bemobil_config.zaplineConfig field to empty.…”
Section: Data Cleaning and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequency-specific noise is removed with Zapline-plus (Klug & Kloosterman, 2022). Zapline-plus is an EEGLAB plugin that removes spectral artifact peaks automatically.…”
Section: Data Cleaning and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%