2004
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6750-4-14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: Background: After transformation, plants that are homozygous and contain one copy of the transgene are typically selected for further study. If real-time PCR is to be used to determine copy number and zygosity, it must be able to distinguish hemizygous from homozygous and one-copy from two-copy plants. That is, it must be able to detect two-fold differences.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
57
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
57
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although qPCR has previously been used to identify homozygous plants in early generations [7][8][9]18], none of the previously reported qPCR methods can simultaneously achieve high accuracy, reliability, and simplicity for determining transgene homozygosis and transgene stacking (Supplementary Table 2). For example, only 15-46 % of qPCR for copy number determination has been confirmed by Southern blotting analysis in a study involving qPCR screening [18]. In another qPCR-based method, the accuracy only reached 83 % [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although qPCR has previously been used to identify homozygous plants in early generations [7][8][9]18], none of the previously reported qPCR methods can simultaneously achieve high accuracy, reliability, and simplicity for determining transgene homozygosis and transgene stacking (Supplementary Table 2). For example, only 15-46 % of qPCR for copy number determination has been confirmed by Southern blotting analysis in a study involving qPCR screening [18]. In another qPCR-based method, the accuracy only reached 83 % [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Ϫ⌬⌬Ct method (29). The p values for significant differences are provided and indicated by the asterisks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though both approaches were developed for relative copy number estimates, the former is based on a ratio between two targets while the latter quantifies an unknown amount of target towards a standard curve for the same target [22,23]. So far, qPCR has been employed to detect transgene copy number in several plant species, such as Nicotiana tabacum [24], Brassica napus [25], Zea mays hybrids [20], Oryza sativa spp. [26], Gossypium spp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%