1998
DOI: 10.1023/a:1009957032554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: The differing sensitivity of the proximal and distal channels to changes in cerebral and extracerebral oxygenation is compatible with theoretical models of NIR light transmission in the adult head and may provide a basis for spatially resolving these changes. The optimal emitter-detector separation for adult NIRS requires further investigation and may differ between individuals.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The shortest source-detector separation in the pHOS is however 2 cm, a distance long enough for the detector to pick up some brain signal [48,49], and therefore using these measurements to decontaminate the 3.0 and 3.5 cm measurements would produce erroneous results. It is also acknowledged that Monte Carlo simulations in the adult head suggest an error of over 20% in the measurement of optical absorption using an FD spectrometer with source-detector spacing between 3.0 and 4.5 cm, induced by the extra-cerebral tissue [50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shortest source-detector separation in the pHOS is however 2 cm, a distance long enough for the detector to pick up some brain signal [48,49], and therefore using these measurements to decontaminate the 3.0 and 3.5 cm measurements would produce erroneous results. It is also acknowledged that Monte Carlo simulations in the adult head suggest an error of over 20% in the measurement of optical absorption using an FD spectrometer with source-detector spacing between 3.0 and 4.5 cm, induced by the extra-cerebral tissue [50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, it was shown that an increase in interoptode distance leads to an increase in the measurement sensitivity to the absorption changes in the brain. [13][14][15] It was also reported that utilization of the frequency-domain technique 16 as well as time-resolved measurements [17][18][19] allow one to discriminate information originating from the cortex and extracerebral tissues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of this skepticism comes fi-om the fact that at short distances between emitters and detectors the cortical NIR signal can be confounded by changes in oxygenation of scalp muscles (Germon et al, 1994). While such confounds are less of a concern with greater emitter-detector separation (Germon et al, 1998), increased separation decreases the overall signal-to-noise ratio and is influenced more by blood flow beneath the cortical surface. Even at some "optimal" emitter-detector separation NIR signal strength is affected by regional differences in the thicknesses of the skull and scalp tissues and in the geometry of the brain surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%