1997
DOI: 10.1023/a:1009754006096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bayo and Ledesman [28] formulated a "mass-orthogonal" projection method to improve the situation where the augmented Lagrangian formulation [13,14] satisfies the weighted constraint to machine accuracy but doesn't satisfy to the same level of accuracy for individual constraints at position, velocity and acceleration levels. Cuadrado et al [29] developed a more efficient implementation of the mass-orthogonal projection which requires only successive forward reductions and back-substitutions, and then Blajer [30] gave a correcting formulation which doesn't need to update the Lagrange multipliers. The energy consideration with velocity projection was studied by Orden et al [31,32], providing an alternative interpretation of its effect on the stability and a practical criterion for the mass-orthogonal projection matrix selection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bayo and Ledesman [28] formulated a "mass-orthogonal" projection method to improve the situation where the augmented Lagrangian formulation [13,14] satisfies the weighted constraint to machine accuracy but doesn't satisfy to the same level of accuracy for individual constraints at position, velocity and acceleration levels. Cuadrado et al [29] developed a more efficient implementation of the mass-orthogonal projection which requires only successive forward reductions and back-substitutions, and then Blajer [30] gave a correcting formulation which doesn't need to update the Lagrange multipliers. The energy consideration with velocity projection was studied by Orden et al [31,32], providing an alternative interpretation of its effect on the stability and a practical criterion for the mass-orthogonal projection matrix selection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, adopting a Newton-Raphson solution scheme instead of the fixed point one can be advantageous in terms of efficiency and stability [10]. This requires the introduction of the numerical integrator formulas in the equations of motion.…”
Section: Implementation Of the Methods Following A Newton-raphson Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is then possible to assume that the constraints are exactly fulfilled at some of these levels, which enables one to remove the corresponding terms ,˙ , or¨ from the dynamic equations (6a). An index-1 Newton-Raphson implementation with position and velocity projections was described in [10]. To obtain this algorithm, it was assumed that the projections enforced = 0 anḋ = 0 and only the term¨ had to be considered in the equations of motion.…”
Section: Augmented Lagrangian Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations